| Revision as of 21:02, 28 October 2007 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits add pic← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:02, 29 October 2007 edit undoSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] titled ''"Pajeokdo"'' (The breaking of serenity) drawn by ].]] | ] titled ''"Pajeokdo"'' (The breaking of serenity) drawn by ].]] | ||
| == Blocked, for ] at ] == | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:80%; border:1px solid #EB2323;" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| | | |||
| |You have been ''']''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:20 hours|a period of '''20 hours'''|'''a short time'''}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Bungeoppang|at ]}}. It is essential that you are more careful to '''] controversial changes''' with the user in question, rather than simply ]: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia - please bear this in mind. | |||
| ''Kind regards'',<br>] 15:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <div align="right" style="font-size:12px">''If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by<br>adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. -->"<nowiki>{{</nowiki>]|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki>"<!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below this text, or ]''.</div><!--- User:AGK/Blocked/3RR - base page ---> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I don't game a system as Sennne gorosh frames me. If administers see my contribution history, you will know that I'm usually editing in this time His efforts trying to accuse me of the 3RR twice is enough! Even the first report has nothing to do with him because he didn't participate in the article at all and the editors including me are meditating. Besides, he has been just stalking me at every sing moment and then seized the moment to works off his grudge again. It is very terrible to see his disruptive behaviors. In addition, I didn't violate the 3RR this time. Please read my explanation in the first report done by Sennen goroshi. The first revert was begun by Sennen goroshi and I reverted 3 times and he did also 3 times. I didn't even get informed for the report which is out of the wiki standard. | |||
| He complained the warning message in the summary field, but it is one of his tactics to attack his opponents. Because according to Sennen goroshi's contribution history, he has always warned opponents with {WP:3RR in a summary field. (I can't convey the link, so please see the history of edit history of Origins of Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea Besides, I think warning the 3RR in the summary filed is helpful for editors to prevent from making more mistakes. | |||
| Did you read the first report above and my explanation? He has bore deep grudges against me. Besides, I'm a victim of his abusive insult all the time, and he is the one gaming the Wiki rule. Please reconsider the case again. He's been once banned for his disruptive conducts why didn't you give me an opportunity. If you think I have to bear such the series of his insult, I want to report his slurs over several editors of course including me. But I don't how to do that. I'm not familiar with wiki tools. Thanks. ---Appletrees 16:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)|decline=I don't see a 3RR violation on ], but I see you have been engaged in revert warring with the same users for a number of days. You were let off the hook regarding a 3RR violation a few days ago, but you continued the revert warring again yesterday. You know about ] policy, and it seems that you did three reverts, but then stopped to avoid a 3RR block. I not only agree with Anthony, but I also believe the block should have been extended for your constant revert warring over the pats few days on a number of articles. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 17:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| :: I see that you archived your talk page, but when you did so, you must have deleted the talk regarding your ban, by accident. I assume it was an accident, because I'm sure that you realise that removing an admin's comments from your page, especially comments regarding bans, 3RR, edit warring, etc would not really be acceptable, because if you did anything else that required an admin's attention, the admin would be unaware of the previous comments made by the admin who banned you, and the admin who declined your appeal to have the ban removed. Sorry to be a pain, I just thought it would be best if someone put this back for you. thanks ] 03:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:02, 29 October 2007
User talk:Appletrees/Archive 1
Blocked, for revert-warring at Bungeoppang
|
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 20 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Bungeoppang. It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia - please bear this in mind.
Kind regards, |
adding the text "{{unblock|your reason here}}" below this text, or contact me.
Caspian blue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't game a system as Sennne gorosh frames me. If administers see my contribution history, you will know that I'm usually editing in this time His efforts trying to accuse me of the 3RR twice is enough! Even the first report has nothing to do with him because he didn't participate in the article at all and the editors including me are meditating. Besides, he has been just stalking me at every sing moment and then seized the moment to works off his grudge again. It is very terrible to see his disruptive behaviors. In addition, I didn't violate the 3RR this time. Please read my explanation in the first report done by Sennen goroshi. The first revert was begun by Sennen goroshi and I reverted 3 times and he did also 3 times. I didn't even get informed for the report which is out of the wiki standard.
He complained the warning message in the summary field, but it is one of his tactics to attack his opponents. Because according to Sennen goroshi's contribution history, he has always warned opponents with {WP:3RR in a summary field. (I can't convey the link, so please see the history of edit history of Origins of Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea Besides, I think warning the 3RR in the summary filed is helpful for editors to prevent from making more mistakes.
Did you read the first report above and my explanation? He has bore deep grudges against me. Besides, I'm a victim of his abusive insult all the time, and he is the one gaming the Wiki rule. Please reconsider the case again. He's been once banned for his disruptive conducts why didn't you give me an opportunity. If you think I have to bear such the series of his insult, I want to report his slurs over several editors of course including me. But I don't how to do that. I'm not familiar with wiki tools. Thanks. ---Appletrees 16:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't see a 3RR violation on Bungeoppang, but I see you have been engaged in revert warring with the same users for a number of days. You were let off the hook regarding a 3RR violation a few days ago, but you continued the revert warring again yesterday. You know about WP:3RR policy, and it seems that you did three reverts, but then stopped to avoid a 3RR block. I not only agree with Anthony, but I also believe the block should have been extended for your constant revert warring over the pats few days on a number of articles. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I see that you archived your talk page, but when you did so, you must have deleted the talk regarding your ban, by accident. I assume it was an accident, because I'm sure that you realise that removing an admin's comments from your page, especially comments regarding bans, 3RR, edit warring, etc would not really be acceptable, because if you did anything else that required an admin's attention, the admin would be unaware of the previous comments made by the admin who banned you, and the admin who declined your appeal to have the ban removed. Sorry to be a pain, I just thought it would be best if someone put this back for you. thanks Sennen goroshi 03:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)