Revision as of 21:26, 30 October 2007 editRobert Ham (talk | contribs)461 edits →Changes to Michele Renouf: Pointing out absurdities in edits to Michele Renouf← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:14, 31 October 2007 edit undoRobert Ham (talk | contribs)461 edits →Changes to Michele Renouf: Trying to reason with moronNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: change is an editorial comment, something you've been told shouldn't be added. Similarly, change contains not only an editorial comment, but an editorial comment about a conference that hasn't happened yet. If you're going to continue to edit wikipedia, you should really read ]. ] 21:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | : change is an editorial comment, something you've been told shouldn't be added. Similarly, change contains not only an editorial comment, but an editorial comment about a conference that hasn't happened yet. If you're going to continue to edit wikipedia, you should really read ]. ] 21:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
::What is wrong with you? You've reinstated that I've explicitly told you was an editorial comment! You're obviously not interested in creating a valuable encyclopaedia. Why are you here? ] 07:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:14, 31 October 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Byafet, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 18:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Changes to Michele Renouf
The recent changes you made to Michele Renouf are entirely POV and violate WP:NPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Ham (talk • contribs) 07:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- This change is an editorial comment, something you've been told shouldn't be added. Similarly, this change contains not only an editorial comment, but an editorial comment about a conference that hasn't happened yet. If you're going to continue to edit wikipedia, you should really read Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view. Robert Ham 21:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- What is wrong with you? You've reinstated a change that I've explicitly told you was an editorial comment! You're obviously not interested in creating a valuable encyclopaedia. Why are you here? Robert Ham 07:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)