Revision as of 19:08, 5 September 2007 editStan weller (talk | contribs)3,503 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:13, 5 November 2007 edit undo80.41.132.125 (talk) not mick jaggerNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Fannish tone. | *Fannish tone. | ||
*After cleanup, improve to good article status. | *After cleanup, improve to good article status. | ||
Not sure if this is the correct place for this but the paragraph starting with Some tracks (including "Brown Sugar" and "]") in 69-74 section needs sorting - for some reason i cant save any changes!!!!!!!1 thanks |
Revision as of 16:13, 5 November 2007
- the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
- all images need sources and fair use rationales.
The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone- the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 40+ years the band have existed- Fannish tone.
- After cleanup, improve to good article status.
Not sure if this is the correct place for this but the paragraph starting with Some tracks (including "Brown Sugar" and "You Gotta Move") in 69-74 section needs sorting - for some reason i cant save any changes!!!!!!!1 thanks