| Revision as of 03:17, 18 October 2007 editTurtlescrubber (talk | contribs)2,351 edits →Sorry, didn't see your edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:49, 5 November 2007 edit undoPhoenix79 (talk | contribs)6,884 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :I see what you are saying about appearances but he does "appear" in the futurama episodes albeit as an animated character. My major concern is that this doesn't devolve into a trivia section where every southpark, simpsons, internet video, snl skit and mainstream reference is treated in the same fashion and with the same level of importance as a SNL appearance or voiceover. What do you think? ] 20:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC) | :I see what you are saying about appearances but he does "appear" in the futurama episodes albeit as an animated character. My major concern is that this doesn't devolve into a trivia section where every southpark, simpsons, internet video, snl skit and mainstream reference is treated in the same fashion and with the same level of importance as a SNL appearance or voiceover. What do you think? ] 20:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::I definitely agree that his daughters involvement should be included. However, I don't think South Park should be included because that opens the floodgates for everything else. To properly maintain a pop culture section such as this (which I have always been against) you need to draw the line somewhere. A while ago I chose to draw the line at productions that in someway involved Al Gore. I have used this on many other pages to reduce the size and scope of trivia sections. Allowing the South Park reference (a show that I like and I also like that episode) allows for everything that is remotely related to Al Gore. So, if you think we should include the South Park ref. then we need to think of a new way to draw the line. If not the section will expand, bloat and eventually be cut to a stub. It's the life cycle of a trivia section. I don't think I am making much sense anymore. Let me know. ] 03:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | ::I definitely agree that his daughters involvement should be included. However, I don't think South Park should be included because that opens the floodgates for everything else. To properly maintain a pop culture section such as this (which I have always been against) you need to draw the line somewhere. A while ago I chose to draw the line at productions that in someway involved Al Gore. I have used this on many other pages to reduce the size and scope of trivia sections. Allowing the South Park reference (a show that I like and I also like that episode) allows for everything that is remotely related to Al Gore. So, if you think we should include the South Park ref. then we need to think of a new way to draw the line. If not the section will expand, bloat and eventually be cut to a stub. It's the life cycle of a trivia section. I don't think I am making much sense anymore. Let me know. ] 03:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == ] Merge == | |||
| ] has started to unilaterally merge the episodes together, not waiting until the poll has closed. As there is a 3:1 opinion out there that this should not occur and I do not wish to break the 3R rule I was wondering if you could help me with reverting his edits? Thanks. -- ] 23:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:49, 5 November 2007
Sections of this page older than 31 days are automatically archived.
Awesome!
Haha, I love the Wikipe-tan visual novel graphic! You *are* the type of person who keeps the internet alive. ;-) Gzabers 06:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't see your edit summary
Before I reverted you. I don't think that contributions to futurama really count as a voice acting career. His other stint was on SNL and that's not really acting. I would say contributions or appearances would be more suitable. What do you think? Turtlescrubber 19:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I see what you are saying about appearances but he does "appear" in the futurama episodes albeit as an animated character. My major concern is that this doesn't devolve into a trivia section where every southpark, simpsons, internet video, snl skit and mainstream reference is treated in the same fashion and with the same level of importance as a SNL appearance or voiceover. What do you think? Turtlescrubber 20:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I definitely agree that his daughters involvement should be included. However, I don't think South Park should be included because that opens the floodgates for everything else. To properly maintain a pop culture section such as this (which I have always been against) you need to draw the line somewhere. A while ago I chose to draw the line at productions that in someway involved Al Gore. I have used this on many other pages to reduce the size and scope of trivia sections. Allowing the South Park reference (a show that I like and I also like that episode) allows for everything that is remotely related to Al Gore. So, if you think we should include the South Park ref. then we need to think of a new way to draw the line. If not the section will expand, bloat and eventually be cut to a stub. It's the life cycle of a trivia section. I don't think I am making much sense anymore. Let me know. Turtlescrubber 03:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Imaginationland Merge
User:Swellman has started to unilaterally merge the episodes together, not waiting until the poll has closed. As there is a 3:1 opinion out there that this should not occur and I do not wish to break the 3R rule I was wondering if you could help me with reverting his edits? Thanks. -- UKPhoenix79 23:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)