| Revision as of 07:06, 27 December 2004 editMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 editsmNo edit summary | Revision as of 07:12, 27 December 2004 edit undoBoothy443 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,606 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| * Support, certainly. It's an excellent article that I've referred to many a time. ] 14:14, 15 May 2004 (UTC) | * Support, certainly. It's an excellent article that I've referred to many a time. ] 14:14, 15 May 2004 (UTC) | ||
| * Support ] 18:56, May 15, 2004 (UTC) | * Support ] 18:56, May 15, 2004 (UTC) | ||
| * Support --] 07:12, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:12, 27 December 2004
London Underground
A comprehensive, interesting and well-written article, in my opinion. Stewart Adcock 22:51, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
- support. Pedro 01:12, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
- support - full of detail, excellent writing, character. --Andrew 19:04, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Support -- Kaihsu 21:45, 2004 May 8 (UTC)
- Support. --Zigger 01:51, 2004 May 9 (UTC)
- Brilliant writing, fascinating, useful. Meelar 03:26, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
- support, although still room for improvement VampWillow 10:21, 2004 May 9 (UTC)
- Support. I love the tube, and this article is just very comprehensive and accessible (unlike the tube itself :-)
JFW | T@lk 11:27, 9 May 2004 (UTC) - Support Dmn 23:24, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
- Support Gandalf61 15:07, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Support MGM 11:03, May 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Support, certainly. It's an excellent article that I've referred to many a time. Ambivalenthysteria 14:14, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
- Support RedWolf 18:56, May 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Support --Boothy443 07:12, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)