Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tawker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:54, 9 November 2007 editHiding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,138 edits Sorry: sig← Previous edit Revision as of 15:48, 11 November 2007 edit undoHiding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,138 edits Sorry: rNext edit →
Line 49: Line 49:


] I know this is so not something worth it from your end, but from my end I'm obliged to say it. I was scanning some old contribs of mine and noticed I opposed your second RFA. What was I on? My god was I wrong and thank god you passed. All I can say was that I really respect Splash and his opinion really swayed me. Anyway, all the best, and take it easy, :) Sorry, I left the beer in the car. ] ] I know this is so not something worth it from your end, but from my end I'm obliged to say it. I was scanning some old contribs of mine and noticed I opposed your second RFA. What was I on? My god was I wrong and thank god you passed. All I can say was that I really respect Splash and his opinion really swayed me. Anyway, all the best, and take it easy, :) Sorry, I left the beer in the car. ]
*You're too kind. Have a good 'un, and I owe you a beer. ] <small>] </small> 15:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:48, 11 November 2007

Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages when the above gets sorted out


This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives

Removal of template acknowledging source of imported material

Please see Template talk:EnPW. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. Robin Patterson 18 Feb 2007

Master Nan

I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Studydoc (talkcontribs) 14:18, Mar 14, 2007 (UTC).

Cadiz Record

Why deleted? regards densbtly

Deletion of Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Page

Hi,

I noticed you apparently deleted the "Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency" (MIGA). How come? Is there a copyright infringement (I'm guessing that's what "copyvio" means)?

I should point out I work for MIGA.

Thanks, Michael Durr mdurr@worldbank.org —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikedurr (talkcontribs) 14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

In Remembrance...

Remembrance Day


--nat 06:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Mercury has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Sorry

Hopefully a wiki-beer will make up for the terrible wrong I did you

I know this is so not something worth it from your end, but from my end I'm obliged to say it. I was scanning some old contribs of mine and noticed I opposed your second RFA. What was I on? My god was I wrong and thank god you passed. All I can say was that I really respect Splash and his opinion really swayed me. Anyway, all the best, and take it easy, :) Sorry, I left the beer in the car. User:Steve block