| Revision as of 22:35, 23 August 2002 editOrtolan88 (talk | contribs)10,369 edits talk page is open for business | Revision as of 22:38, 23 August 2002 edit undoMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 edits me likeNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| It is easier to display the Misplaced Pages, easier to edit or add to its articles, if we don't make the markup any more complex than is necessary to display the information in a useful and comprehensible way. That is the first goal, but ease of editing and maintenance is right behind it. | It is easier to display the Misplaced Pages, easier to edit or add to its articles, if we don't make the markup any more complex than is necessary to display the information in a useful and comprehensible way. That is the first goal, but ease of editing and maintenance is right behind it. | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Very nice. Me like. Me add to later. --] | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 23 August 2002
I've just set up a bunch of targets. Fire away. Organization, content, examples, everything is up for grabs. As I say on the page, let's keep it simple here and farm out the complexities to other articles. Ortolan88 22:35 Aug 23, 2002 (PDT)
Do you think there should be a section like this:
Don't get fancy
It's easier for you and whoever follows you if you don't try to get too fancy with your markup. Even with markup as suggested here, you shouldn't assume that any markup you put in here guarantees a certain appearance when it is displayed.
It is easier to display the Misplaced Pages, easier to edit or add to its articles, if we don't make the markup any more complex than is necessary to display the information in a useful and comprehensible way. That is the first goal, but ease of editing and maintenance is right behind it. Ortolan88
Very nice. Me like. Me add to later. --mav