| Revision as of 22:41, 23 August 2002 editOrtolan88 (talk | contribs)10,369 edits moving don't get fancy← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:43, 23 August 2002 edit undoKoyaanis Qatsi (talk | contribs)13,445 edits style questionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Very nice. Me like. Me add to later. --] | Very nice. Me like. Me add to later. --] | ||
| :Moving it now. Add to it there. ] | :Moving it now. Add to it there. ] | ||
| I think it's standard in print media to italicize birth and death dates in short biographical entries. Is this the case or am I mistaken? (I ask because I've just changed the page to reflect that convention). ] 22:43 Aug 23, 2002 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:43, 23 August 2002
I've just set up a bunch of targets. Fire away. Organization, content, examples, everything is up for grabs. As I say on the page, let's keep it simple here and farm out the complexities to other articles. Ortolan88 22:35 Aug 23, 2002 (PDT)
Do you think there should be a section like this:
Don't get fancy
It's easier for you and whoever follows you if you don't try to get too fancy with your markup. Even with markup as suggested here, you shouldn't assume that any markup you put in here guarantees a certain appearance when it is displayed.
It is easier to display the Misplaced Pages, easier to edit or add to its articles, if we don't make the markup any more complex than is necessary to display the information in a useful and comprehensible way. That is the first goal, but ease of editing and maintenance is right behind it. Ortolan88
Very nice. Me like. Me add to later. --mav
- Moving it now. Add to it there. Ortolan88
I think it's standard in print media to italicize birth and death dates in short biographical entries. Is this the case or am I mistaken? (I ask because I've just changed the page to reflect that convention). --KQ 22:43 Aug 23, 2002 (PDT)