Revision as of 17:21, 3 October 2007 edit67.176.142.101 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:05, 18 November 2007 edit undoDonreed (talk | contribs)7,544 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Unreferenced|date=July 2007}} | {{Unreferenced|date=July 2007}} | ||
'''Marian Persecutions''' refers to the persecutions of ]s and ]s under the Queen ]. This issue is of some controversy as numerically, she does not appear to have killed any more for religious dissent than other Tudors{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. However, such executions occurred over a period of only 5 |
'''Marian Persecutions''' refers to the persecutions of ]s and ]s under the Queen ]. This issue is of some controversy as numerically, she does not appear to have killed any more for religious dissent than other Tudors{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. However, such executions occurred over a period of only 5 years—a significantly shorter time period than most Tudor monarchs. | ||
Several issues made her persecutions more memorable for ]. | Several issues made her persecutions more memorable for ]. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
First, she came after a Protestant king. Hence those who deemed the ] as progress saw any persecutions of it by a Catholic to be a step backward. The right of monarchs to persecute religions was rarely if ever disputed at this time{{Fact|date=July 2007}}, but for Protestants to face persecution after feeling they had won England seemed like an indignity. As virtually all English monarchs after her would be Protestant this added to the image of her persecutions as strange{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. | First, she came after a Protestant king. Hence those who deemed the ] as progress saw any persecutions of it by a Catholic to be a step backward. The right of monarchs to persecute religions was rarely if ever disputed at this time{{Fact|date=July 2007}}, but for Protestants to face persecution after feeling they had won England seemed like an indignity. As virtually all English monarchs after her would be Protestant this added to the image of her persecutions as strange{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. | ||
Second, the percentage of her victims to be elderly men or women of any age seemed unusually high{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. Whether this is actually true is unclear, but the perception was there and seems to have had some statistical support. Either way this perception angered many as it seemed to be attacking more vulnerable elements of society. | Second, the percentage of her victims to be elderly men or women of any age seemed unusually high{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. Whether this is actually true is unclear, but the perception was there and seems to have had some statistical support. Either way this perception angered many as it seemed to be attacking more vulnerable elements of society. (Of course, elderly people often die, even if they are not killed, so one would have to verify their executions before evaluating these statistics.) | ||
Third, her husband was Spanish. This angered many people of |
Third, her husband was Spanish. This angered many people of differinging religious views. Related to this, most people at this time assumed that a woman was ultimately submissive to her husband. Therefore ] was potentially seen as making England submissive to Spain by bringing the ] to England's shores as a kind of wedding present. This offended the English sense of independence. | ||
Lastly, elements of her personality and life history |
Lastly, elements of her personality and life history caused some of her actions to seem more extreme than they may have been in reality. In the past kings often repressed dissent, because it threatened their power; while their actual practice of any religion might be at best inconsistent. Mary appeared to be sincere in her devotion to the Catholic Faith as she understood it. Further she often kept that devotion when it was not in her best interests. Related to that, unlike most of the Tudors she was rarely or never accused of sexual promiscuity. Queen Mary on certain occasions{{Fact|date=July 2007}} expressed a personal bitterness about the Reformation, rather than an abstract political hostility. For Mary Tudor's life, it seemed that the Reformation had humiliated her mother, called Mary a bastard child, and later forced her to plead with her teenage brother to be allowed to practice her faith. This made it a much more personal event than normal for a Catholic monarch, perhaps more personal than it was even to most Popes. Added to that, her mother's origins, the events of her life, and her marriage did cause her to gravitate toward Spain, rather than fight for English independence. | ||
Outside of the controversy what seems clear is that under her 300 people were killed for their faith. This persecution created bitterness for both sides for generations to come. It also tarnished her image perhaps forever. Before she came to power she had widespread sympathy{{Fact|date=July 2007}} even among some Protestants. Many in England saw her as a tragic princess unfairly demeaned by her father ]. Her image after the persecutions turned into that of an almost legendary |
Outside of the controversy what seems clear is that under her 300 people were killed for their faith. This persecution created bitterness for both sides for generations to come. It also tarnished her image, perhaps forever. Before she came to power, she had widespread sympathy{{Fact|date=July 2007}} even among some Protestants. Many in England saw her as a tragic princess unfairly demeaned by her father, ]. Her image after the persecutions turned into that of an almost legendary tyrant called ].This view of Mary was mainly due to the widespread publication of ] during her successor ]'s reign. Foxe may not have been entirely accurate, but he was widely read. | ||
This view of Mary was mainly due to the widepsread publication of ] during her successor ]'s reign. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
* ] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Revision as of 15:05, 18 November 2007
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Marian Persecutions refers to the persecutions of Protestants and dissenters under the Queen Mary I of England. This issue is of some controversy as numerically, she does not appear to have killed any more for religious dissent than other Tudors. However, such executions occurred over a period of only 5 years—a significantly shorter time period than most Tudor monarchs.
Several issues made her persecutions more memorable for England.
First, she came after a Protestant king. Hence those who deemed the Reformation as progress saw any persecutions of it by a Catholic to be a step backward. The right of monarchs to persecute religions was rarely if ever disputed at this time, but for Protestants to face persecution after feeling they had won England seemed like an indignity. As virtually all English monarchs after her would be Protestant this added to the image of her persecutions as strange.
Second, the percentage of her victims to be elderly men or women of any age seemed unusually high. Whether this is actually true is unclear, but the perception was there and seems to have had some statistical support. Either way this perception angered many as it seemed to be attacking more vulnerable elements of society. (Of course, elderly people often die, even if they are not killed, so one would have to verify their executions before evaluating these statistics.)
Third, her husband was Spanish. This angered many people of differinging religious views. Related to this, most people at this time assumed that a woman was ultimately submissive to her husband. Therefore Queen Mary I of England was potentially seen as making England submissive to Spain by bringing the Spanish Inquisition to England's shores as a kind of wedding present. This offended the English sense of independence.
Lastly, elements of her personality and life history caused some of her actions to seem more extreme than they may have been in reality. In the past kings often repressed dissent, because it threatened their power; while their actual practice of any religion might be at best inconsistent. Mary appeared to be sincere in her devotion to the Catholic Faith as she understood it. Further she often kept that devotion when it was not in her best interests. Related to that, unlike most of the Tudors she was rarely or never accused of sexual promiscuity. Queen Mary on certain occasions expressed a personal bitterness about the Reformation, rather than an abstract political hostility. For Mary Tudor's life, it seemed that the Reformation had humiliated her mother, called Mary a bastard child, and later forced her to plead with her teenage brother to be allowed to practice her faith. This made it a much more personal event than normal for a Catholic monarch, perhaps more personal than it was even to most Popes. Added to that, her mother's origins, the events of her life, and her marriage did cause her to gravitate toward Spain, rather than fight for English independence.
Outside of the controversy what seems clear is that under her 300 people were killed for their faith. This persecution created bitterness for both sides for generations to come. It also tarnished her image, perhaps forever. Before she came to power, she had widespread sympathy even among some Protestants. Many in England saw her as a tragic princess unfairly demeaned by her father, King Henry VIII. Her image after the persecutions turned into that of an almost legendary tyrant called Bloody Mary.This view of Mary was mainly due to the widespread publication of Foxe's Book of Martyrs during her successor Elizabeth I's reign. Foxe may not have been entirely accurate, but he was widely read.