Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Dawdle: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:49, 18 November 2007 editRklawton (talk | contribs)Administrators40,714 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Dawdle  Revision as of 17:59, 18 November 2007 edit undoJeodesic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,448 edits Vote delete and reasonsNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Dawdle}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Dawdle}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
'''Nom''' - speedied several times. Fails ] and ]. This new website simply isn't notable. However, its creator doesn't seem to "get it", so I thought an AfD might provide a more suitable forum for the discussion. ] (]) 17:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC) '''Nom''' - speedied several times. Fails ] and ]. This new website simply isn't notable. However, its creator doesn't seem to "get it", so I thought an AfD might provide a more suitable forum for the discussion. ] (]) 17:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Fails to claim notability, and the only references are brief press releases stating the company was launched. ] (]) 17:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 18 November 2007

Dawdle

Dawdle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Nom - speedied several times. Fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. This new website simply isn't notable. However, its creator doesn't seem to "get it", so I thought an AfD might provide a more suitable forum for the discussion. Rklawton (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Categories: