| Revision as of 22:43, 27 November 2007 editA Nobody (talk | contribs)53,000 edits →Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:46, 27 November 2007 edit undoJudgesurreal777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,231 edits →Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::::LOL what's impressive? There is not one reference in the hits! :) Please be serious if you want to keep debating this articles notability, or any other for that matter. ] (]) 22:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | ::::LOL what's impressive? There is not one reference in the hits! :) Please be serious if you want to keep debating this articles notability, or any other for that matter. ] (]) 22:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::::The fact that the topic has attracted that much interest is impressive. Besides, why focus on deleting stuff people worked on rather than improving articles? Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | :::::The fact that the topic has attracted that much interest is impressive. Besides, why focus on deleting stuff people worked on rather than improving articles? Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::Why have an encyclopedia filled with trivia and junk? And besides, I know a lot of the people who help delete articles, and they are some of the most active people in building up articles, especially fiction ones. ] (]) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', there's only so much space here for video game trivia. <font face="Times">]</font><small><sup>'']''</sup></small> 21:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', there's only so much space here for video game trivia. <font face="Times">]</font><small><sup>'']''</sup></small> 21:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:46, 27 November 2007
Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service
- Umbrella Biohazard Countermeasure Service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Resident Evil video game and film articles. This is thus all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:FICT. RMHED (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as it is an organization from a notable game series played by millions of people internationally that has been made into three films also seen by millions of people. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 21:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- References, not "being in a movie" justify notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- It seems to get a lot of hits. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- It seems to be mostly wikipedia mirrors, so not that impressive. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The shear number is really impressive (admittedly, I didn't even expect that many hits). Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- LOL what's impressive? There is not one reference in the hits! :) Please be serious if you want to keep debating this articles notability, or any other for that matter. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The fact that the topic has attracted that much interest is impressive. Besides, why focus on deleting stuff people worked on rather than improving articles? Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why have an encyclopedia filled with trivia and junk? And besides, I know a lot of the people who help delete articles, and they are some of the most active people in building up articles, especially fiction ones. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The fact that the topic has attracted that much interest is impressive. Besides, why focus on deleting stuff people worked on rather than improving articles? Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- LOL what's impressive? There is not one reference in the hits! :) Please be serious if you want to keep debating this articles notability, or any other for that matter. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The shear number is really impressive (admittedly, I didn't even expect that many hits). Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, there's only so much space here for video game trivia. DJ Creamity 21:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)