Misplaced Pages

Carol Dweck: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:09, 9 May 2007 editNawlinWiki (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators221,643 edits add cats, sources, expand← Previous edit Revision as of 02:52, 28 November 2007 edit undoDoczilla (talk | contribs)Administrators49,015 edits clean up using AWBNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Dweck, Carol}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Dweck, Carol}}

] ]
] ]

Revision as of 02:52, 28 November 2007

Carol S. Dweck (born October 17, 1946) is a professor at Stanford University and a social psychologist. She graduated from Barnard College in 1967 and earned a Ph.D. from Yale University in 1972. She taught at Columbia, Harvard University, and the University of Illinois before joining the Stanford faculty in 2004.

Her key contribution to social psychology relates to implicit theories of intelligence. According to Dweck, individuals can be placed on a continuum according to their implicit views of where (intellectual) success comes from. Some believe their success is based on innate ability; these are said to have a "fixed" implicit theory of intelligence. Others, who believe their success is based on hard work and learning, are said to have a "growth" or an "incremental" theory of intelligence. (It is not necessarily the case that individuals will be able to state clearly their own beliefs on the subject, but they can be discerned from answers to simple survey questions, such as "Do you think it is more likely that a student would do well on a test because they are smart, or because they studied hard?")

This is important because (1) individuals with a "growth" theory are more likely to continue despite setbacks and attempt to develop their skill sets even when met with initial failure, and (2) individuals' theories of intelligence can be affected by subtle environmental cues. For example, children given praise such as "good job, you're very smart" are much more likely to develop an innate theory, whereas if given compliments like "good job, you worked very hard" they are likely to develop a growth theory. In other words, it is possible to encourage students, for example, to persist despite failure by encouraging them to think about learning in a certain way.

Sources

Categories: