Misplaced Pages

User:Jinxmchue: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:09, 1 December 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 editsm Reverted to revision 174911738 by 64.237.4.140; Not your choice to remove tag. Once the sockpuppet has been ascertained, it will be made permanent or it'll stay..using TW← Previous edit Revision as of 05:03, 1 December 2007 edit undoJinxmchue (talk | contribs)1,677 edits rm fallacious warning. I don't have control over IP changes. I never hid behind any sockpuppets, and I **NEVER** had any intent to "evade blocks or bans."Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Alright, this isn't working ==
{{Sockpuppeteer|evidence= }}


Obviously, certain users (aka "the usual suspects") have it in for me and are stooping to false accusations of sockpuppetry on my part. I had retired from regular editing and was only making a few edits here and there. I did this without logging in. However, the last three digits of my IP are not static and changed from time to time (only 3 or 4 times since I retired). This was completely out of my control. I was not using these barely different IP addresses as "sockpuppets" to "evade blocks or bans." Not only was it obvious who I was, I freely admitted it. Ah, but that didn't stop the usual suspects from leveling trumped up charges against me. Of course not. I represent what they hate: intelligence, reason, logic, adherence to Wiki guidelines and policies, and - most grievously - an opposing viewpoint (Heaven forbid!). When I made good faith edits in complete agreement with Wiki guidelines, they got together to revert my edits while ignoring said guidelines and accusing me of "Wikilawyering" (well, excuse the crap out of me for sticking to the guidelines, guys - sheesh!). The same people have done this over and over and over to subvert the three-revert rule and wrongfully own articles.
== RETIRED FOR GOOD FOR THE ''RIGHT'' REASON ==


So, whatever. You don't want "sockpuppets" (even if completely imagined)? Fine. Consider me back. I will stay logged in from now on when making edits in order to cheat you of your lame and false accusations against me. Happy? No, you won't be happy until I'm banned forever. Meh.
My faith in God is what is important in my life and I've come to the point in my life where I'm just falling victim to too many distractions: politics, Misplaced Pages, etc. Those things just aren't worth it. They're temporary and are a waste of my time and energy. I need to concentrate on my faith not just for myself, but for my family, too. They need me more than I need Misplaced Pages or political blogs and websites, and I need God more than those things, too. I'm leaving for the right reasons this time and I won't be coming back. I will be making a real, lasting difference elsewhere in the world.


And in accordance to the block that was wrongly placed on me for "edit warring" (a block which was not placed on anyone else involved, of course, despite the fact that they were just as guilty), I will not edit anything more than my user pages for the next 24 hours or so (it's less than that, but I don't want to do the math right now) as per . (See that? Even though I believe the block is wrong, I will still abide by it.)
To those editors on "my side," I thank you for your kindness and friendship.

To those editors on "the other side," I'm not going to leave you with any smarmy or otherwise hostile remarks. I will say that I once believed as you do and I sincerely hope and pray someday you will find what I have. It changed my life. HE changed my life.

Farewell to all, and may God bless you.

] 05:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:03, 1 December 2007

Alright, this isn't working

Obviously, certain users (aka "the usual suspects") have it in for me and are stooping to false accusations of sockpuppetry on my part. I had retired from regular editing and was only making a few edits here and there. I did this without logging in. However, the last three digits of my IP are not static and changed from time to time (only 3 or 4 times since I retired). This was completely out of my control. I was not using these barely different IP addresses as "sockpuppets" to "evade blocks or bans." Not only was it obvious who I was, I freely admitted it. Ah, but that didn't stop the usual suspects from leveling trumped up charges against me. Of course not. I represent what they hate: intelligence, reason, logic, adherence to Wiki guidelines and policies, and - most grievously - an opposing viewpoint (Heaven forbid!). When I made good faith edits in complete agreement with Wiki guidelines, they got together to revert my edits while ignoring said guidelines and accusing me of "Wikilawyering" (well, excuse the crap out of me for sticking to the guidelines, guys - sheesh!). The same people have done this over and over and over to subvert the three-revert rule and wrongfully own articles.

So, whatever. You don't want "sockpuppets" (even if completely imagined)? Fine. Consider me back. I will stay logged in from now on when making edits in order to cheat you of your lame and false accusations against me. Happy? No, you won't be happy until I'm banned forever. Meh.

And in accordance to the block that was wrongly placed on me for "edit warring" (a block which was not placed on anyone else involved, of course, despite the fact that they were just as guilty), I will not edit anything more than my user pages for the next 24 hours or so (it's less than that, but I don't want to do the math right now) as per here. (See that? Even though I believe the block is wrong, I will still abide by it.)