Revision as of 19:10, 1 December 2007 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits →User:67.135.49.177: "enablings"? feh← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:40, 1 December 2007 edit undoJinxmchue (talk | contribs)1,677 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
How about doing something more constructive, like showing him the error of his way, rather than reverting a template which just enables and encourages the behavior that landed him here. ] 18:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | How about doing something more constructive, like showing him the error of his way, rather than reverting a template which just enables and encourages the behavior that landed him here. ] 18:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I'm admittedly violating what I said about not editing anything but my user pages until later with this, but this is a serious enough issue to warrant it. Monk, you need to provide evidence to back up your accusations of my alleged violations of 3RR, disruption and sockpuppetry or retract every single one of them. I won't be holding my breath waiting for that, though. ] 20:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:40, 1 December 2007
As of August 2007, inactive discussions are archived by MiszaBot III after five days. See archive box for previous discussions.
Click here to leave a new message. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
User:67.135.49.177
Maybe if he hadn't been warned twice and simply deleted the warnings there'd be a case for lifting the block. Adam Cuerden 14:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Crockspot, User:67.135.49.177 is Jinxmchue. Jinmchue has been editing from two IPs in order to avoid scrutiny. These edits consists of edit warring only. This has resulted in multiple 3RR vios, disruption and at least one block. He's clearly using IPs to avoid having his bad behavior not associated with his main account, Jinxmchue. That falls under the defintion of sock puppetry at WP:SOCK: "alternate accounts ... a number of uses which are explicitly forbidden - in particular, using an alternate account to avoid scrutiny, to mislead others by making disruptive edits with one account and normal ones with another, or otherwise artificially stir up controversy is not permitted. Misuse of an alternate account may result in being blocked from editing."
How about doing something more constructive, like showing him the error of his way, rather than reverting a template which just enables and encourages the behavior that landed him here. FeloniousMonk 18:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm admittedly violating what I said about not editing anything but my user pages until later with this, but this is a serious enough issue to warrant it. Monk, you need to provide evidence to back up your accusations of my alleged violations of 3RR, disruption and sockpuppetry or retract every single one of them. I won't be holding my breath waiting for that, though. Jinxmchue 20:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)