| Revision as of 00:21, 9 December 2007 editShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 16 sections to User talk:EconomicsGuy/Archive Dec 2007← Previous edit |
Revision as of 01:08, 9 December 2007 edit undoEconomicsGuy (talk | contribs)2,276 edits →Full protection on User talk:Iamandrewrice: Archiving so I don't need to be reminded of it. Out of sight - out of mind!Next edit → |
| Line 23: |
Line 23: |
|
*You are much more likely to get a favorable response if you read these ''before'' you post here. Rather than pay attention to the exact letter of the policy please understand the examples given as they demonstrate the spirit of the policy ] Thanks and happy editing! |
|
*You are much more likely to get a favorable response if you read these ''before'' you post here. Rather than pay attention to the exact letter of the policy please understand the examples given as they demonstrate the spirit of the policy ] Thanks and happy editing! |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Full protection on ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
You're probably right. I'll AGF one more time. ] <sup> ]</sup> 17:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:Page now blanked and full-protected, following yet more attempted apologies and justifications.. What are the odds a user with a coincidentally-similar name pops up within the next couple of days and starts asking for adoption... Enough. I'm going to the pub ☺ ] <sup> ]</sup> 18:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::Good work! Apparently the odds were quite good per which of course you have already seen ;). What on earth is going on? ] 18:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I've now had edits from Andrewsbaby and Andrewsclone. Has he ''really'' nothing better to do? ] <sup> ]</sup> 22:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::hahaha... we'll see... I hope youre starting to understand a little more about me now... you see, its not iamandrewrice that was the first sockpuppet... well, maybe you still don't see... ;) ] 16:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Blocked, of course. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 16:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Thanks! To Tonywalton: It would seem that he hasn't. I think we have all been thoroughly fooled here. This is why good checkusers are so valuable. I mostly feel bad for Jeff though but he seems to take it with good humor. ] 17:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Since it became clear that Iamandrewrice was a sock I've been of the opinion that that was just one of a family and not necessarily the drawer from which all socks flow. I can't see that it makes any difference, TBH. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::EconomicsGuy... you dont understand... half those accounts made that people think are sockpuppets of Iamandrewrice are not even me! They are my friend, Joeseth1992 (which for some reason is classified as a sockpuppet of me anyway)! and most of the rest of them are people I have never even heard of that somehow got involved... and i dont understand why the CU said we were linked... anyway ive replied on the ANI... please go check it out (if you have studied anything about my behaviour, you will know im not the type to vandal... however, go take a look at Joeseth1992's behaviour, and the behaviour of the sockpuppets... you will realise whos behaviour they match more). And please dont block me on this account... you dont know how much effort I have gone to in order to try and set the records straight on this whole thing. If you block this account and ignore the valid information I am giving you, you will not be able to find out what is really going on... please... i am here to help wikipedia... and save not only the site from people like my "friend," but save my reputation... which is vastly diminishing due to vast untruths spread about me... ] (]) 18:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::I really don't understand you. Assuming that this is true why didn't you just create a new account and start over? The new accounts you created weren't created by you to start over - they were created by you to continue your disruptive behaviour. If you ''really'' want this with the best intentions of becoming a part of the community I suggest you create one last account and then disclose that account only to Jeff through e-mail. To the best of my knowledge there is no active checkuser against you. ] (]) 18:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::::::::No economicsguy... please dont believe I was lying! Im not! I dont know why those accounts seem to be associated with me, but that Fettes account and all those others are nothing to do with me! I promise! However, I do know who they actually do belong to... Joeseth1992... if you have a problem, go invesigate him. And we are <b>not</b> the same person! despite what wikipedia says... ¬_¬ |
|
|
|
|
|
Economicsguy... you have been one of the most helpful people on here so far... please dont turn against me now, when I need help to stop this impersonator of me... in fact, a long long time ago (well actually not that long), he logged onto my Iamandrewrice account... and if you dont believe me... go ask Jeffpw if he remembers a time when I asked him if I could change my password because someone has logged onto my account... |
|
|
|
|
|
please... you have to listen... Im not lying... if you protect my page again, I wont be able to help you get to the real root of the problem - Joeseth1992... |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 18:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
|