Revision as of 08:29, 12 December 2007 view sourceUtcursch (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators163,328 edits →Hurlstone: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:00, 12 December 2007 view source BigHaz (talk | contribs)Administrators17,265 edits →Vandalism on my Talk: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
The user is obviously a single-purpose account. I've tried to clean-up his/her edits a bit, by removing criticism from the intro, and by removing weasel words and selective quotations. The article needs more positive stuff, though. ] | ] 08:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | The user is obviously a single-purpose account. I've tried to clean-up his/her edits a bit, by removing criticism from the intro, and by removing weasel words and selective quotations. The article needs more positive stuff, though. ] | ] 08:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Vandalism on my Talk == | |||
Following on from that list of accounts and so forth before, two more names and an IP. The accounts are the creatively named "HazBig" and "SmallHaz", both of which have been indefblocked for obvious reasons. There's also the IP 60.230.37.94, which I'll lay odds is the same guy (I've blocked it, but not indefinitely, just in case). I believe these ones are coming from a home computer, so with any luck we might be able to zap him and have done with it. If you could drop me a line on my Talk page when you take care of it, that would be great. What with Christmas coming up, I might forget to check back here. ] - ] 13:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:00, 12 December 2007
This user is a cricket pundit for the Times of India, the world's largest distribution daily newspaper. Details/disclaimerThis user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
You are welcome to leave me a message or request admin action.
Blnguyen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has been an administrator since 29 May 2006 and an arbitrator since January 1, 2007.
FOR ANONS, I WILL DEFINITELY REPLY HERE. FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, THIS MAY BE HERE OR AT YOUR TALK PAGE. IF IT IS A MULTI-PARTY DISCUSSION, THEN DEFINITELY HERE User:Blnguyen/box
ArchivesArchives roughly divided into 40kb chunks
- /Archive1: October 2005 - 2/3/06 (44kb)
- /Archive2: 3/3 - 23/3 (40kb)
- /Archive3: 23/3 - 7/4 (41kb)
- /Archive4: 7/4 - 2/5 (45kb)
- /Archive5: 2/5 - 18/5 (45kb)
- /Archive6: 19/5 - 26/5 (43kb)
- /Archive my RfA: separate archive regarding my RfA from 22-31/5
- /Archive7: 26/5 - 6/5 (45kb)
- /Archive8: 7/6 - 16/6 (43kb)
- /Archive9: 17/6 - 29/6 (42kb)
- /Archive10: 30/6 - 8/7 (40kb)
- /Archive11: 9/7 - 13/7 (40kb)
- /Archive12: 13/7 - 18/7 (42kb)
- /Archive13: 18/7 - 22/7 (42kb) (includes most of the Indian religion stuff, which started a while ago)
- /Archive14: 22/7 - 6/8 roughly 2006 (42kb)
- /Archive15: 6/8 - 16/8 (43kb)
- /Archive16: 7/8 - 10/8 (41kb) (separate for Indian religion hostilities)
- /Archive17: 10/8 - 17/8 (41kb) (separate for Indian religion hostilities)
- /Archive18: 16/8 - 23/8 (40kb)
- /Archivesurvey: for the religion survey
- /Archive19: 17/8 - 1/9(43kb) (separate for Indian religion hostilities + cucumber)
- /Archive20: 23/8 - 1/9 (40kb)
- /Archive21: 1/9 - 6/9 (40kb)
- /Archive22: 6/9 - 14/9 (40kb)
- /Archive23: 4/9 - (Balkan battles) (24kb)
- /Archive24: 4/9 - 22/9 (42kb) (general India disputes)
- /Archive25: 4/9 - 14/9 (52kb)(Karnataka vs Maharashtra)
- /Archive26: 15/9 - (general) (37kb)
- /Archive27: 20/9 - 29/9 (Karnataka vs Maharashtra part 2)
- /Archive28: 29/9 - 19/10 (40kb)
- /Archive29: 19/10 - 30/10 (40kb)
- /Archive30: 26/10 - 2/11 ?(Karnataka vs Maharashtra part 3)
- /Archive31: 1/11 - 8/11
- /Archive32: November 8
- /Archive33: November 17 - (India:Bodhidharma and Indian Buddhist Movement
- /Archive34: 21/11 - 28/11
- /Archive35: 28/11 - 12/12
- /Archive36: 12/12 - 28/12
- /Archive37: (Karnataka vs Maharashtra part 4)
- /Archive38:
- /Archive39:
- ....
- /Archive64:
assistance with mediatin on the Bosnian Mujahideen article
Hi, I'm having a problem with the editors The Dragon of Bosnia and Grandy Grandy who have repeatedly deleted an article which I edit called Bosnian Mujahideen (see edit history here ). He has also deleted links to the article on other articles. He seems to be basing his deletion of the article on two sets of arguments:
- that the term Bosnian Mujahideen does not exist. In fact the term is used by published (research and books) experts.. I admit though that there are other terms often used, such as El Mujahid, El Mujaheed or just Mujahideen (spelled in various forms).
- claims the article is based on "false info/original research" or "propaganda attempt or original research if you wish, based on unverified sources per WP:RS". As you will see from the references used in the article it is quite thoroughly sourced from what must be judged to be neutral and/or reliable sources.hmatter. RegardsOsli73 (talk) 00:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
ALH
Thx for your msg. I did a little work on Ian Johnson a while back, don't know if you saw it. I feel there's enough for a FA on him as well. Same for Sam Loxton; I reckon I can get him there too. I've been doing a little prelim research on both and located some imgaes etc. So are we drawing short straws for Hamence and Saggers??!! I'm not sure what is the minimum for FT, is it each article has to have at least GA status? Sooner or later we have to deal with the Bradman conundrum - I saw the article on Sir Isaac Newton and like that design. That would work well, say splitting his life into two articles, then we can bring the daughter articles back in and lose some of the periphal stuff. With a bit of hard work the Don could be done in a week or so....thoughts? Phanto282 (talk) 08:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Brown the Invincible
Good work! --Dweller (talk) 08:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK
On 6 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bill Brown (cricketer), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cheers, Daniel 10:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: RfCU/case/Peter zhou
I'm sorry to bug you, but the purpose of this RfCU was to flush out any hidden pre-baked socks not to confirm what I already know. nat.utoronto 15:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
As the header says. Acalamari 04:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Yen Bai Mutiny
Hi Blnguyen - full details of the book are:
"Les Linh Tap - Histoire des militaires indochinois au service de la France" - author: Maurice Rives - publisher: Editions La Vauzelle 1999 - ISBN: 2-7025-0436-1
As the title indicates it is a detailed and profusely illustrated history of the locally recruited regiments that France used (and misused) to hold Indochina from 1859 to 1954. The coverage of Yen Bai focuses on the actual mutiny and not the broader political context but it might be a useful reference for any reader who wants to pursue the general topic further.
Congratulations on the way you have built up the Yen Bai article almost from scratch! It now provides really first-class coverage of an important but little known incident.
Regards Buistr (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter
| ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Karan Arjun
Hey! I wonder why you removed all my edits on the page, including the cast section I'd added. Shahid • 23:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I went to the old version in the history and it seems that while you were adding the cast, I was on the old version. Sorry. Great movie, although it was pretty silly... Blnguyen (bananabucket) 23:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, my bad. Yeh, great film! The topic is quite silly, but I can't help, it brings me sweet memories from my childhood, like many other 90s films of Salman, Shahrukh etc. Best regards, Shahid • 23:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Speed
Sigh. Kirill 03:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, we might as well move along now. Shuffling things back and forth isn't going to be very meaningful at this point, I think. Kirill 04:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hurlstone
The user is obviously a single-purpose account. I've tried to clean-up his/her edits a bit, by removing criticism from the intro, and by removing weasel words and selective quotations. The article needs more positive stuff, though. utcursch | talk 08:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism on my Talk
Following on from that list of accounts and so forth before, two more names and an IP. The accounts are the creatively named "HazBig" and "SmallHaz", both of which have been indefblocked for obvious reasons. There's also the IP 60.230.37.94, which I'll lay odds is the same guy (I've blocked it, but not indefinitely, just in case). I believe these ones are coming from a home computer, so with any luck we might be able to zap him and have done with it. If you could drop me a line on my Talk page when you take care of it, that would be great. What with Christmas coming up, I might forget to check back here. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 13:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)