Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sphinx Head: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:39, 10 December 2007 editMptp94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,967 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:20, 17 December 2007 edit undoMangojuice (talk | contribs)19,969 edits oldafdsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Project Cornell}} {{Project Cornell}}
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=Start|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=Start|importance=low}}
{{oldafdfull|date=15 May 2006|result='''delete'''}}
{{oldafdfull|date=9 December 2007|votepage=Sphinx Head|result='''keep'''}}



I dont understand why this article would be considered for deletion. If you have any suggestions for how to make it better please post them here. ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) I dont understand why this article would be considered for deletion. If you have any suggestions for how to make it better please post them here. ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:20, 17 December 2007

Template:Project Cornell

WikiProject iconSecret Societies (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2006. The result of the discussion was delete.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.


I dont understand why this article would be considered for deletion. If you have any suggestions for how to make it better please post them here. Cornell1890 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

The biggest issue I would see for this article is the list of notable alumni. If you look at some of the pages regarding freemasonry, and its appendant/concordant bodies, we have tried to limit those lists to only a very few, specifically looking at those who are notable because of their membership, or their activities which relate to their membership in the group.--Vidkun (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)