| Revision as of 04:37, 24 December 2007 editEl Sandifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,527 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:19, 25 December 2007 edit undo71.167.76.13 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I agree that trimming in-universe summary is important, but sourcing does not seem to me to be a useful way to approach the matter, especially as sourcing is, by longstanding convention, not an issue with the sort of material being used here. I think a more productive approach would be to simply remove it per ]. ] (]) 04:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC) | I agree that trimming in-universe summary is important, but sourcing does not seem to me to be a useful way to approach the matter, especially as sourcing is, by longstanding convention, not an issue with the sort of material being used here. I think a more productive approach would be to simply remove it per ]. ] (]) 04:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Pope John Paul II|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. --] (]) 02:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:19, 25 December 2007
 Archives |
Cleaning up government agencies article
I agree that trimming in-universe summary is important, but sourcing does not seem to me to be a useful way to approach the matter, especially as sourcing is, by longstanding convention, not an issue with the sort of material being used here. I think a more productive approach would be to simply remove it per WP:FICT. Phil Sandifer (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pope John Paul II. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --71.167.76.13 (talk) 02:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)