Misplaced Pages

User talk:RG2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:53, 27 December 2007 editKransky (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users8,937 edits Nancy Reagan protection← Previous edit Revision as of 01:18, 27 December 2007 edit undoRG2 (talk | contribs)13,304 edits replyNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
You have nominated for deletion several photos and images. I will not oppose you deleting obvious copyright violations (but not images where you speculate they are violations - let me investigate first). Other images were removed from articles and are thus orphans, until at least I pursuade others to reinsert them back in (it would have been easier if you didn't nominate so many at one time -especially over the Xmas break!) You have nominated for deletion several photos and images. I will not oppose you deleting obvious copyright violations (but not images where you speculate they are violations - let me investigate first). Other images were removed from articles and are thus orphans, until at least I pursuade others to reinsert them back in (it would have been easier if you didn't nominate so many at one time -especially over the Xmas break!)
As for the bus in the reservoir? I think I uploaded that by mistake! ] (]) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC) As for the bus in the reservoir? I think I uploaded that by mistake! ] (]) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

:There's a grace period after a deletion nomination, and I can always undelete an image myself if a mistake was made. But anyway, to summarize, I guess the ones that aren't obvious copyright violations (save for the bus in the reservoir) are:
:*] and ] – We'll need to verify the sources for these images if they are to be kept. Rarely are Flickr images licensed under the GFDL, anyway, so that's another sign something's fishy.
:*] – You replaced this with what seems to be a more complete map, ], . Is the original image worth keeping? If it's potentially useful, but not needed for Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider uploading it to the .
:*] and ] – I take it from your wording that you want those images displayed in various articles, but you removed them yourself after others disagreed with their addition?
:-- ]<sup><font color="#CC5500">]</font></sup> 01:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:18, 27 December 2007

User talk:RG2/archive

Nancy Reagan protection

Maybe you can help me. There is rampant vandalism, POV edits, and non-MOS edits being made to Nancy Reagan and my request for protection was declined. The vandalism has only worsened. I revert this anon one more time it will be 3RR. Please help out. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 07:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on it, but FAs currently on the Main Page are rarely protected. Admittedly, I'm not sure how wise this policy is. -- RG 10:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Lots of photos

You have nominated for deletion several photos and images. I will not oppose you deleting obvious copyright violations (but not images where you speculate they are violations - let me investigate first). Other images were removed from articles and are thus orphans, until at least I pursuade others to reinsert them back in (it would have been easier if you didn't nominate so many at one time -especially over the Xmas break!) As for the bus in the reservoir? I think I uploaded that by mistake! Kransky (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

There's a grace period after a deletion nomination, and I can always undelete an image myself if a mistake was made. But anyway, to summarize, I guess the ones that aren't obvious copyright violations (save for the bus in the reservoir) are:
-- RG 01:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)