| Revision as of 21:06, 31 December 2007 editGeorge The Dragon (talk | contribs)Rollbackers5,264 edits →Horadrim: delete, nn irl← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:12, 31 December 2007 edit undoBlueanode (talk | contribs)296 edits →Horadrim: change my wordsNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Comment''' - Sorry about that, your right it is Diablo, I read Diablo when I wrote that, as I write them most of the time each time and not mass produce tags, and Doom must have been in my head when I wrote it. The concerns remain though, that there is a lack of notabiilty and referencing in this article. ] (]) 19:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - Sorry about that, your right it is Diablo, I read Diablo when I wrote that, as I write them most of the time each time and not mass produce tags, and Doom must have been in my head when I wrote it. The concerns remain though, that there is a lack of notabiilty and referencing in this article. ] (]) 19:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''speedy |
*'''speedy close'''- the fantasy world makes it notable enough, this policy is wrong, and per above this user is clearly ].--] (]) 20:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' No real-world notability. ] (]) 21:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:12, 31 December 2007
Horadrim
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and appears to be simply an in-universe plot repetition of the plot of different Diablo games. As such, its just duplication and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment You have stated this is from the Doom series, yet is clearly from the Diablo series. Please slow down at flagging articles for deletion en masse, as you've continually projected very little knowledge about the hundreds of articles you've hastily tried to erase from this site with minimal effort. 216.37.86.10 (talk) 17:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not notable outside the game/fantasy world. Pharmboy (talk) 17:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Close You're gaming the system by daily flagging articles based on games, TV and/or movies for not having "real world notability" per anonymous ISP up there Doc Strange (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Sorry about that, your right it is Diablo, I read Diablo when I wrote that, as I write them most of the time each time and not mass produce tags, and Doom must have been in my head when I wrote it. The concerns remain though, that there is a lack of notabiilty and referencing in this article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- speedy close- the fantasy world makes it notable enough, this policy is wrong, and per above this user is clearly gaming the system.--Blueanode (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)