Revision as of 14:05, 9 September 2007 editWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits further comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:55, 2 January 2008 edit undoWeiv (talk | contribs)5,319 edits WikiProject TaoismNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Taoism|class=Dab}} | |||
Re Xian, no citation is necessary. It's common knowledge. | Re Xian, no citation is necessary. It's common knowledge. | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 2 January 2008
Taoism (inactive) | ||||
|
Re Xian, no citation is necessary. It's common knowledge.
The X in Xian is like the X in Xmas. If "xmas" = "christmas", then "xian" = "christian".
--63.166.226.83 17:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's original research without a citation. Extending a rule from one instance to another is a leap of logic, which is OR. I've checked three on-line dictionaries and two paper dictionaries, including my copy of the compact Oxford English Dictionary. WLU 13:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)