| Revision as of 21:09, 1 January 2008 editRandomXYZb (talk | contribs)15,343 edits ClipMeet← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:20, 3 January 2008 edit undoRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on WKYT-TV.Next edit → | ||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
| Six of one and half a dozen of the other, I suppose, but db-bio does cover web content and companies. Either way, the result is hopefully the same. Regards. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 21:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC) | Six of one and half a dozen of the other, I suppose, but db-bio does cover web content and companies. Either way, the result is hopefully the same. Regards. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 21:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == January 2008 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:WKYT-TV|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Whether you are correct or not, if it isn't obvious vandalism that you are reverting (which it isn't -- it is a content dispute) you are breaking the 3RR.'' ] (]) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:20, 3 January 2008
 Archives |
|---|
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For all your work with vandalism, but especially tonight (New Years Eve), I, Sharkface217, hereby award you with this barnstar. Good job, man.S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
USRD Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 17
|
|
|
| The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||
| Volume 1, Issue 17 • December 15, 2007 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —O bot (t • c) 04:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
From 'Number631'
Thanks for all the answers!
Complaint
Why are you so counterproductive? Stop threatening me and don't post anything to me anymore. thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.172.231 (talk) 20:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
What?
Threatening me after a first-offense? Mellow out. 71.115.195.159 (talk) 22:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
u had a go at me
i thought billie piper was a porn star and u had a go at me
Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School
Hi, I fully understand your delete recommendation at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School because the page was in bad shape. However, it has now been rewritten with many references to establish compliance with WP:N. I wonder if you would be good enough to revisit your recommendation, please? TerriersFan (talk) 02:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your reconsideration. TerriersFan (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
WTF!?
I did NOT add "incorrect information" to this article. My information was 100% correct. What is wrong with you?--71.203.147.175 (talk) 23:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Periodistas spam warned
Hello, I noticed you spam warned this user for edits to Karen Maron. I removed the blog references, but I'm not sure I see the spam. At any rate, he seems to have stopped now. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 02:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. I've left him a message requesting English sources. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 02:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Uthradom Thirunal
Hello. u added a tag on Uthradom Thirunal. The article already existed as Uthram Thirunal but that was the wrong name and i created Uthradom Thirunal and merely redirected Uthram Thirunal there. Also i will be adding more information in a few days to the article.Manu —Preceding comment was added at 03:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
about Badi School (Panama)
I request the page be undeleted.
With the template post to my talk area you referred to the Misplaced Pages:Your first article which has a small section Misplaced Pages:Your first article#And be careful about... which says: "These are articles about places like schools, or streets that are of interest to a relatively small number of people such as alumni or people who live nearby. There is no consensus about such articles, but some will challenge them if they include nothing that shows how the place is special and different from tens of thousands of similar places. Photographs add interest. Try to give local-interest articles local colour. Third-party references are very useful to prove that the subject you are writing about is notable."
Another wikipedia reference addressing school associated articles is Misplaced Pages:Places of local interest#Creating articles about places of local interest which largely echoes the above but adds: "*Interesting aspects of the activities that go on at that place (e.g. for a school, interesting curricular or extracurricular activities)"
Having a local government use the curriculum of the school as part of city wide extension to the schools offerings of assistance to parents of students seems to be a highly distinguishing quality almost unique in western culture. --Smkolins (talk) 13:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Additionally Misplaced Pages:Notability (schools) states "At present schools do not have agreed guidelines. This is because several attempts at producing a schools policy have failed." Please note I'm not a member of any prior discussions on what is notable or not about schools. This article presents several specifics which I agree generally are worthwhile but ends "A school article that fails to establish notability will not be deleted, if the school can be confirmed to exist. It would be simply redirected to the appropriate article for the relevant locality or school district (US and Canada only). Thus the article could be later expanded back out into its own article again when sources should become available."Smkolins (talk) 13:07, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Writers Guild of America Strike
Why are you discriminating against the article I added? It is a serious analysis, and was actually written by a university professor. if you don't like the source, be honest, instead of making false allegations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.83.66 (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
IP sock
Unfortunately we can't indef-block IPs unless they are open proxys. I kept his block for vandalism, though. jj137 04:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
ClipMeet
Six of one and half a dozen of the other, I suppose, but db-bio does cover web content and companies. Either way, the result is hopefully the same. Regards. Giles Bennett 21:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WKYT-TV. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Whether you are correct or not, if it isn't obvious vandalism that you are reverting (which it isn't -- it is a content dispute) you are breaking the 3RR. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)