Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jpgordon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:57, 2 July 2005 edit69.209.210.198 (talk) []← Previous edit Revision as of 05:54, 6 July 2005 edit undoMolloy (talk | contribs)290 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 88: Line 88:
==]== ==]==
Would you mind taking a look? ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 30 June 2005 20:10 (UTC) Would you mind taking a look? ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 30 June 2005 20:10 (UTC)

==Link==
Hey, would you mind removing that link, it does not represent me at all. Those photographs are 5 years old and do not represent me at all, it's a chapter I have closed in my life. What is this, a "name and shame" campaign? This stinks of a personal attack. ]

Revision as of 05:54, 6 July 2005

Cleared 15:09, 16 May 2005 (UTC) -- check history for record.


my proposal

Hi,

I just announced I am stepping away from the proposal discussion for several days. I know I have polarized the discussion, which I didn't want to do. If you are willing, I hope you will visit the page periodically and do whatever you can or think is appropriate to facilitate discussion between both sides.

Thanks

Steve

Image deletion

Please contact me next time you speed deleted one of my images (Image:Hammersmith and city line small.png). I'm really annoyed that my version of this is gone now. ed g2stalk 13:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

The Jews were responsible for Apartheid

Our historical revisionist is back at Apartheid. Jayjg 18:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

That's not what the Inclusion states, although jayjg wants to frame it up that way. Jpgordon, I see you are being called to help circumvent the 3 Revert Rule.69.217.123.174 16:35, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • I'm sure you can read dates. That was almost a month ago -- and he didn't need to call me for anything; I have Apartheid on my watchlist. And if you didn't notice, I was the one who reverted your edit in the first place. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:14, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Pandeism

I'm back a day early, but today is all about unpacking and cleaning up, so not much wiki-time. I'll address Progressivepantheist's concerns tomorrow. -- BDAbramson 18:43, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

France

Are you sure that this (link will be incorrect after next edit) is the rv you wanted to make? All it does is add the word "link" in a place where it doesn't make a lot of sense to me. --W(t) 06:28, 2005 May 31 (UTC)

Blacks and The Holocaust

Just as Jews were throughout Europe, so, too, were blacks -- but in far smaller numbers. Most were "mixed-race." They were discriminated against and marginalized and segregated from mainstream German society. Most were forcibly sterilized, but it is estimated that at least 400 German blacks were sent to concentration camps. African-American woman jazz musician Valaida Snow was arrested in Denmark while living in and touring Europe and survived 18 months in Wester-Faengler, a Nazi concentration camp. She was released, along with some Allied troops, as part of a prisoner swap. And there were others. A relatively quick search on the Internet should yeild at least spotty information. Here's one: http://www.thechronicle.demon.co.uk/archive/lovehate.htm . Just as non-Jewish victims of The Holocaust are continually overlooked, its black victims are almost never mentioned. deeceevoice 20:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Al Qunaytirah

Could you take a look at this article? I am having trouble with Yuber pushing POV entries. I cannot compromise with him anymore, so I need a third opinion.

Guy Montag 23:15, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Hi! thank you supporting my successful admin candidacy. I hope that you will always feel that I am a responsible administrator. JeremyA 05:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Template:Copyrightproblem

Template:Copyrightproblem, which you created, is listed for deletion at WP:TFD. BlankVerse 11:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you are still using this template, I will change my delete vote. BlankVerse 14:39, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

My Rfa

Thank you for supporting me! --Kbdank71 13:26, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

User:Jpgordon/Copyrightproblem

I have userfied {{copyrightproblem}} to User:Jpgordon/Copyrightproblem as per WP:TFD. Regards, Frazzydee| 14:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

220 Oak Street Tenants Association

If you want to nail it down, I'd say it could go under section 1.2.4, attempts to contact the entity named in the title. It's an attempt to contact all the members of the association. It's also an ad and an attempt at a webhosting, which are usually speedily deleted as well, even though the criteria may not explicitly state them. --Xcali 15:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hate crime?

That's the whole point; if you start putting terrorist acts into hate crimes, then you're going to have thousands of items to chose from - Palestinian bus bombings, IRA pub bombings, Tamil bombs, Chechen school massacres, whatever. Hate crimes are typically confined to acts which don't reach the level of terrorism; beating someone up because of their ethnicity, spray-paining offensive slogans, destroying tombstones, etc. Including only Kahane's act is, of course, just another example of this editor's obssession with Jews and POV pushing. As well, it appears to be original research; Kahane's act is generally defined as a terrorist act (except by his supporters), not a hate crime. Jayjg 00:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stormfront links

Yep. I've noticed the same thing. I've started looking for them now. As a result, my page is being vandalized more frequently. Not a big deal, though. Others seem to catch and correct it before I even notice. :) Keep up the good work. Peace 2 u. deeceevoice 13:44, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

apartheid

What do you think we should do? I'm out of reverts, yet 3RR blocking wasn't very effective. Protect the article again? --W(t) 29 June 2005 06:01 (UTC)

The discussion is still ongoing.69.216.247.228 29 June 2005 20:02 (UTC)

If that's true, then stop inserting material until the discussion concludes. By the way, continually making assertions which no-one else agrees with is not really "discussion", but rather using Misplaced Pages for a soapbox. Jayjg 29 June 2005 20:27 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. Please review the ongoing discussion. 69.209.227.142 29 June 2005 21:33 (UTC)

There is no discussion, there is just you repeating yourself. Most other editors have given up on you presenting anything new, or remotely proving your point. I have joined them. Jayjg 29 June 2005 21:43 (UTC)

You don't have more editors to call in for reinforcement?69.209.210.198 2 July 2005 14:57 (UTC)

Suicide bombing

Would you mind taking a look? Jayjg 30 June 2005 20:10 (UTC)

Link

Hey, would you mind removing that link, it does not represent me at all. Those photographs are 5 years old and do not represent me at all, it's a chapter I have closed in my life. What is this, a "name and shame" campaign? This stinks of a personal attack. Molloy