| Revision as of 07:28, 6 January 2008 editMostlyharmless (talk | contribs)4,420 editsm →Brahmin Tamil: insert moved from prod← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:09, 6 January 2008 edit undoWiki alf (talk | contribs)62,119 edits →Brahmin Tamil: kNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ** ] (]) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | ** ] (]) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ***Oops. So does that mean that we close this? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | ***Oops. So does that mean that we close this? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' I can see no valid rationale for deletion. The article needs work, so '''keep''' for improvement.--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:09, 6 January 2008
Brahmin Tamil
- Brahmin Tamil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Deserves discussion - appearance at wikibooks is not sufficient reason for Prod deletion Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Obviously there's a wikibook with the same content. However, I think that the subject here meets WP:V, WP:N, and other criteria, and with a few alterations will form a decent article on the subject. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep no reason for deletion. SeanMD80 03:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, Nominator has stated reasons for keeping, not deletion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 04:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- cough Uncle G (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oops. So does that mean that we close this? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- cough Uncle G (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I can see no valid rationale for deletion. The article needs work, so keep for improvement.--Alf 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)