Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:29, 7 January 2008

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

VigilancePrime (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Users keep reinserting personal attacks against other users on his user page but he has no right to use sdaid page to attack other users and admins. Thanks, SqueakBox 04:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Adam Yahiye Gadahn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, vandalism spike as a result of recent video.Johnny Au (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jmlk17 04:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

TNA Final Resolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

'Semi-protection' Article getting lots of IP vandalism. TJ Spyke 04:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jmlk17 04:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection Vandalism, We got another case of the "end of the world!" thing going on here!.—BoL 03:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• Semi-protected Acalamari 04:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

E. Pluribus Wiggum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

'semi-protect'. This episode just aired and it has already been subject to extreme anon vandalism which is sure to continue.--The Dominator (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Maxim_(talk) 01:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Barney & Friends episodes and videos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. In the past three days, all but three edits to this page have been IP vandalism and the reverting thereof. The sad thing is--they're totally different IPs, so I can't even console myself that it's just ONE user. (sigh)Gladys J Cortez 00:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected --Maxim_(talk) 01:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Cayra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full-protect. This article is the repeated victim of mass deletions of content and inappropriate flagging. These are the actions of a small group of editors, who consistently refuse to engage the concerned community . In response, I am going through the mediation process; I have asked for a mediation cabal currently. Today they responded by nominating the article for speedy deletion. I am looking to preserve the page until mediation has resolved the issue.wikiwatcher9999 (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)wikieditor9999

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jmlk17 00:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Debt-based monetary system (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full-protect. high level of edit-warring. --96.224.27.204 (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jmlk17 23:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Kelly Brook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

indefinite cascading semi-protection Vandalism, someone keeps editing the biography to say "Kelly is a dirty whore..." etc..Skitzo (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jmlk17 23:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Republic of China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protection Article is constantly being reverted from its current, factually correct state to a version that is politically slanted towards Taiwanese independence. Users reverting (usually IP addresses) claim the article as it is is pro-PRC despite not indicating how it is pro-PRC. These revisions occur constantly, especially when there is a note at the top of the article stating not to edit the certain aspects of the article unless a consensus is made on the talk page. The article is of a politically sensitive nature and protection is needed at least until late March. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jmlk17 23:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Axl Rose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection Article is subject to IP vandalism from different IPs on almost a daily basis, and has been for some time. The vast majority of edits to the page basically consist of IP/new account vandalism and reverting said vandalism--since December 25 for instance the article has been vandalized about 30 times. Subject seems to be visible enough that it would fulfill requirements #1 and #2 for semi-protection. DanielEng (talk) 22:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Michael Greiner 22:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

2008 Dakar Rally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection heavy ip vandalism since 6 January, when placed in In the news section on mainpage. --Jklamo (talk) 22:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jmlk17 23:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Mitch Cullin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protection Dispute, 24.205.146.121 keeps posting spam links..Compwhiz II 22:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Watching at the moment. Woody (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined Woody (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Weeaboo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

It redirects to the wrong place, and I don't see why it is protected.

Weeaboo should redirect to Otaku or possilby Japanophile...

It probably doesn't merit a full article by itself though...but if this isn't fixed one might need to be created.

Declined See Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion. John Reaves 19:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection for a week, anon reverting against consensus without discussing; protection will encourage talk activity, see if there's more to it than trolling. Chris Cunningham (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined DMacks (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Crocker Motorcycles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Full Protection. Edit war. Content dispute between an anon, and a registered user. Malinaccier (talk) 04:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Just some additional info: The content dispute involves one anon editor, and another user (User:ClanCC, if I'm not mistaken). ClanCC appears to have broken the WP:3RR. J-ſtan_{User page} 04:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined Woody (talk) 21:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Keith Allen‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary semi-protection 75% 12/16 edits vandalism & undo's over last fortnight from static & dynamic IPs. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 21:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for two weeks. —Kurykh 21:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Alexfusco5/Clock (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

indefinite full protection , User request (yes full was intentional, I understand I will not be able to edit it).Alexfusco 20:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Fully protected I was a little hesitant over this one as user talk pages should generally not be protected except in significant circumstances, but since it is just a re-direct and your main user talk page is still available for users to comment I will make an exception here. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Alexfusco5/Clock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection , User request.Alexfusco 20:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Non-free content (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection. Edit warring taking place. Suggest protection until consensus is established Seraphim 13:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz 20:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Future temporary full protection Fully protect it during the release day. The article have a long history of bad rushed edits with no references that usually ending up reverted. The talk page for the article is so long it has been archived multiple times, there is a lot of discussion about even the most minor things. There is a big risk that the actual release will make people too happy for their own good. I think that the few people who can edit protected articles is likely to be interested enough in the subject to keep it updated during the release day. The page has been semi-protected regularly, but I feel that a full protection is needed for the release date.Henke37 (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Woody (talk) 18:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I will second Woody. Sorry, Henke, but barring vandalism or unsourced additions, we cannot prot. -Jéské 04:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

M1 carbine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protection Dispute, edit war with no sign of stopping keeps showing up on Recent changes.Alexfusco 18:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Jane Austen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection IP vandalism over the past few days, but particularly today; request semi-protection for one week. Awadewit | talk 17:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Snowolf 17:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Escape the Fate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Heavy ip vandalism past few days, adding false and unsourced information even after warnings and editing notes. Timmeh 17:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protect too much original research and nonsensical edits have been added by anons lately. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 15:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 15:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Intelligent design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Page was protected after the matter was resolved. There never was an edit war.

I made a suggestion about attributing a view, and User:Dave souza reverted it. (1RR, perfectly normal)

I thought his rv reason was insufficient, so I reverted his rv. (1RR, happens a lot if not "normal")

Dave reverted back. (2RR, pushing the envelope but not a violation)

I am on parole, so a second reversion on my part would be 2RR. But I only made one revert (Dave made two reverts, which is fine with me).

After this, I wrote on Dave's page indicating that I understood his reasoning and then decided to let his reversion stand, because I did not want to revert any further.

He even wrote back that he "supports Ed" by which I assume he means that our discussion is going somewhere fruitful.

I don't see how this constitutes an edit war, so I request that the page be unprotected.

Meanwhile, there is plenty of discussion at Talk:Intelligent design about the matter in question, and I have no intention of going against consensus about it. --Uncle Ed (talk) 15:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined Please talk to the admin who protected the page first, and see how it goes. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I-Doser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

unprotection The page is currently protected from recreation and has been previously deleted as violating CSD A7 (that was 9 months ago, the article definitely passes notability criteria now) and CSD G11. I was looking for the article yesterday and was very surprised not to find one. Any chance of getting the page unprotected to create an article that won't violate CSD G11? Cheers! BanRay 11:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Declined Woody (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

• cheers BanRay 15:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:62.158.82.123 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

temporary full protection User talk of banned user, Vandalise. The Helpful One 14:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 8 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Oxymoron 14:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

User:BalkanFever/monobook.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection. It runs javascripts so my account could be compromised if the page is not protected. BalkanFever 14:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator All .js pages in the User: space are automatically full-protected to all users but the user who it belongs to.. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)