| Revision as of 09:15, 11 January 2008 editCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,915 editsm keepsies← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:57, 11 January 2008 edit undoDhartung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,482 edits →Maria Lauterbach: wkNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''', nothing to make an encyclopedia article out of here, at the moment this belongs on Wikinews (if it belongs anywhere). <b>]</b> 08:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', nothing to make an encyclopedia article out of here, at the moment this belongs on Wikinews (if it belongs anywhere). <b>]</b> 08:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Notable enough. And if Misplaced Pages is not for news articles, then we should delete articles about all missing people as well. Including ], ], ], etc. --] (]) 08:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Notable enough. And if Misplaced Pages is not for news articles, then we should delete articles about all missing people as well. Including ], ], ], etc. --] (]) 08:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Comment''' See ]. Arguing that this is not a notable missing persons topic is certainly possible to do in good faith, particularly given the lack of consensus or guidelines regarding such articles. --] | ] 10:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' certainly the subject of plenty of 3rd party coverage. cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 09:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' certainly the subject of plenty of 3rd party coverage. cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 09:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak keep'''. I'm not convinced of the long-term importance here, but there has been quite a bit of national attention paid to the story due to the military angle. Regardless of outcome it is likely to end up as a high-profile UCMJ case of some kind. --] | ] 10:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:57, 11 January 2008
Maria Lauterbach
- Maria Lauterbach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Keep Deletion proposed by Arbeit Sockenpuppe, who gave the reason: "NN bio". This is a user that claims to be an administrator, although nobody knows that for sure. That user added a prod tag, although from the sources and references in the article it is clear that this is not an NN bio. I erased the prod tag, and added the afd tag. I don't want this article to be deleted, but I certainly don't want it to be deleted because of the prod tag without any discussions. Quoth nevermore (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There was no need to create an AfD since the article has a PROD tag on it. But since the AfD has been removed, would it be acceptable to remove the PROD? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 04:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Arbeit Sockenpuppe is the account of User:Y for use when he is at work. James086 07:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - While it has plenty of sources, it seems to be more of a news article than an encyclopedia article. See point 5 of WP:NOT#NEWS and the second paragraph of WP:N#TEMP. If this turns into a large controversy it should be kept however. James086 07:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, nothing to make an encyclopedia article out of here, at the moment this belongs on Wikinews (if it belongs anywhere). BLACKKITE 08:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Notable enough. And if Misplaced Pages is not for news articles, then we should delete articles about all missing people as well. Including Disappearance of Madeleine McCann, Taylor Behl, Natalee Holloway, etc. --Adi Sinaga (talk) 08:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment See WP:ALLORNOTHING. Arguing that this is not a notable missing persons topic is certainly possible to do in good faith, particularly given the lack of consensus or guidelines regarding such articles. --Dhartung | Talk 10:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep certainly the subject of plenty of 3rd party coverage. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I'm not convinced of the long-term importance here, but there has been quite a bit of national attention paid to the story due to the military angle. Regardless of outcome it is likely to end up as a high-profile UCMJ case of some kind. --Dhartung | Talk 10:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)