Misplaced Pages

User talk:Caniago: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:57, 11 January 2008 editJosuechan (talk | contribs)1,281 edits + comment← Previous edit Revision as of 21:06, 12 January 2008 edit undoColoane (talk | contribs)1,107 edits Macau FAC: + comNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


Thank you for your time. ] (]) 18:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your time. ] (]) 18:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

:Josuechan, simply ignore his comment on the FAC page. No matter what you changed, he won't. He simply wanted to vote strong Oppose, nothing else. The most effective way to cope with rogue is giving back what he gave you. ] (]) 21:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:06, 12 January 2008

Caniago is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.


Nonsense of Bemo

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bemo, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bemo provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bemo, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Patent nonsense

You tagged the articles on Madiun Stadium‎, Gelora Bung Tomo‎, and Bukittinggi Airport‎ as patent nonsense. While I have no idea whether these articles were true or accurate, they did not constitute patent nonsense as that term is used in Misplaced Pages. They looked like perfectly normal articles about stadiums and an airport, respectively. Please don't overuse the {{db-nonsense}} tag. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Madiun Stadium

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Madiun Stadium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not and Misplaced Pages:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Madiun Stadium

An editor has nominated Madiun Stadium, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Madiun Stadium and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

List of search engines

Hello Caniago. Please add some rationale on the Talk to your recent move of a table here from Desktop search. At first I thought it was a mistake, but now I seem some of your thinking. Since this article is watched by so many, we should try to avoid multiple reverts if we can. EdJohnston (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

See Misplaced Pages:Embedded_list#Lists_within_articles. (Caniago (talk) 00:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC))

AfD nomination of Bukittinggi Airport

An editor has nominated Bukittinggi Airport, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bukittinggi Airport and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Improvement

You helped me to improve the article Macau and now I am going to help you to improve Indonesia. This is not a bad faith. Coloane (talk) 03:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

No, by using FAR you are seeking to remove Indonesia from FA status because you don't like Caniago criticising Macau. If you were genuine about actually improving Indonesia, you'd make the changes your self, or just use the talk page. --Merbabu (talk) 04:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Macau FAC

Hi Caniago, I've made some edits trying to address your concerns raised regarding the FAC Macau. I hope you'll reconsider your position. At least change "strong oppose" to mere "oppose"? ;)

Thank you for your time. Josuechan (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Josuechan, simply ignore his comment on the FAC page. No matter what you changed, he won't. He simply wanted to vote strong Oppose, nothing else. The most effective way to cope with rogue is giving back what he gave you. Coloane (talk) 21:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)