| Revision as of 23:56, 14 January 2008 editXenon54 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,655 edits restoring archive← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:34, 15 January 2008 edit undoPrimeHunter (talk | contribs)Administrators79,177 edits restore links | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==AS article status== | == AS article status == | ||
| Thanks for the accolade. I'm afraid that not everyone agrees, as can be seen from the FARC commentary. Eubulides 22:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | Thanks for the accolade. I'm afraid that not everyone agrees, as can be seen from the ]. ] 22:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == Asperger syndrome ease-of-understanding == | ||
| ⚫ | Thanks for providing the examples of hard-to-understand bits in ]. I fixed things as best I could and have a question or two, which I put in ]. ] 10:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ==Asperger syndrome ease-of-understanding== | ||
| ⚫ | Thanks for providing the examples of hard-to-understand bits in Asperger syndrome. I fixed things as best I could and have a question or two, which I put in Talk:Asperger syndrome #Examples I found. Eubulides 10:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:34, 15 January 2008
AS article status
Thanks for the accolade. I'm afraid that not everyone agrees, as can be seen from the FARC commentary. Eubulides 22:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Asperger syndrome ease-of-understanding
Thanks for providing the examples of hard-to-understand bits in Asperger syndrome. I fixed things as best I could and have a question or two, which I put in Talk:Asperger syndrome #Examples I found. Eubulides 10:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)