| Revision as of 07:43, 15 January 2008 editAntelan (talk | contribs)4,688 edits →Ivies: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:03, 15 January 2008 edit undoAbridged (talk | contribs)1,110 edits →IviesNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Pardon my interest, but what is it that brings you back, after 6 months of inactivity, to comment on Adam's RfC? <font color="red">]</font><font color="blue">]</font> <sup><font color="darkred">]</font></sup> 07:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | Pardon my interest, but what is it that brings you back, after 6 months of inactivity, to comment on Adam's RfC? <font color="red">]</font><font color="blue">]</font> <sup><font color="darkred">]</font></sup> 07:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :]. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:03, 15 January 2008
Please don't leave messages here, as I will not see them. See the edit history for previous discussions.
Homeopathy
Hey, I just finished a rewrite draft of the Homeopathy article. The article has major problems and I'm trying to turn it into a featured article and I noticed you were a major contributor to it so I thought you might want to help. The draft is a rough approximation of what it should be like. It obviously has some flaws in it's format and wording right now but they will be kinked out within the next couple of days. Right now what I want is for you, if you're interested in helping to improve the article, to come to the articles talk page. I'm trying to get all of the articles major contributors to discuss the rough draft and hack out a consensus so that we can replace it with the current article. There we will all discuss the article and how it could be improved before we replace the current homeopathy article with it. In order for this to work we need to follow a few rules. The first rule, the most important rule, is that no one but me can edit the rough draft. Do not edit the rough draft. This precaution is used to prevent edit warring and loss or addition of information that might not be up to consensus. Don't worry, It's just a draft and you'll have all the time you want to make changes after we've replaced it with the current article. The second rule is that all proposed changes in the rough draft must be made on the talk page of the rough draft and must be clear and concise. At that point anyone involved will discuss the proposed changes and if agreed by consensus they will be implemented. We will do that until there is no disputes or disagreements. After all disputes are hammered out, we will replace the homeopathy article with the rough draft. At that point there shouldn't be anyone needing to make huge edits, and if you do see an edit that you want to make, be sure to add a note on the talk page PRIOR to making the edit so that consensus can be reached and then you should make the edit. If you have any questions you can leave me a message on my talk page. Here is the link to the rough draft Link to rough draft. Thanks.
Ivies
Pardon my interest, but what is it that brings you back, after 6 months of inactivity, to comment on Adam's RfC? Antelan 07:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)