Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tulkolahten: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:55, 16 January 2008 editIoeth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,787 editsm The Barnstar of Diligence: replied on my talk page← Previous edit Revision as of 19:15, 16 January 2008 edit undoSciurinæ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Rollbackers12,786 edits The Barnstar of Diligence: commentNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:
|} |}
{{talkback|Ioeth|Re: Barnstar}}] <sub>(] ] ])</sub> 16:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC) {{talkback|Ioeth|Re: Barnstar}}] <sub>(] ] ])</sub> 16:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

:With all due respect,<br>
:but Tulkolahten has that piece of vandalism on your userpage with the same edit summary as in content matters shortly before (), where as usual he fights for a pro-Polish and pro-Czech point of view in German-related matters (more pro-Czech than Polish of course ). Using the same summary is particularly unacceptable. As far as this month is concerned, there have been more content reversions with the label "vandalism" or its abbreviation "rvv" in edit summaries than there have been vandalism reversions ( as compared to ). It is also not the first time he has been approached for that ( ). He has demonstrated his knowledge of the offensive nature that in a content dispute calling the other's edits "vandalism" has, too ( ). ] (]) 19:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:15, 16 January 2008

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. Click here to add a new message

Read Signpost Archive

Archives
No.1. No.2. No.3. No.4. No.5. No.6. No.7. No.8. No.9. No.10. No.11.
The Signpost
24 December 2024


Hi

I was wondering if there is a Czech word for this political entity and if there is a Czech history stub since it was part of Kingdom of Bohemia. http://en.wikipedia.org/State_country Have a good day :) --Molobo (talk) 13:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Diligence

The Barnstar of Diligence
At first, I was going to give you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for reverting the vandalism on my userpage (and your other efforts with vandalism), but after looking at your contributions, I feel this one is more appropriate. For your efforts all around Misplaced Pages, with fine contributions to content, debates, vandalism and more, I award you this barnstar, Tulkolahten. Thank you, and keep up the great work! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Tulkolahten. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

With all due respect,
but Tulkolahten has reverted that piece of vandalism on your userpage with the same edit summary as in content matters shortly before (), where as usual he fights for a pro-Polish and pro-Czech point of view in German-related matters (more pro-Czech than Polish of course ). Using the same summary is particularly unacceptable. As far as this month is concerned, there have been more content reversions with the label "vandalism" or its abbreviation "rvv" in edit summaries than there have been vandalism reversions ( as compared to ). It is also not the first time he has been approached for that ( block notice ). He has demonstrated his knowledge of the offensive nature that in a content dispute calling the other's edits "vandalism" has, too ( ). Sciurinæ (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)