| Revision as of 16:29, 27 December 2007 editScskowron (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users689 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:18, 18 January 2008 edit undoLogical Defense (talk | contribs)1,365 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Unreal. Just... whatever. == | |||
| Some kid (teenager, anyway) comes along under the alias ] and tags the Varg image on the black metal page several months ago. I couldn't understand why; the rationale was there, albeit improper formatting. Then I did a little reseach and found a religious background to the kid. Fine, but that shouldn't impede on his Misplaced Pages edits. | |||
| Anyway, he backed down. Months later, a couple days ago, he returns with a new alias, ], and retires his former account. Without calling attention to this, however, he goes and starts a topic about me and the Varg picture issue... again, now! Months later! Yikes! Guess he's not over it... somehow... sadly. | |||
| Anyway, now he's just out to say the image is needless, as I have since instated the proper fair use rationale tags. Can you believe it? See if you want to weigh in on this issue, seeing as that you also guard the page from such lunacy. And if not, that's okay. In the end, even if it gets deleted, I already know what to do. ] (]) 04:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:18, 18 January 2008
Unreal. Just... whatever.
Some kid (teenager, anyway) comes along under the alias The Parsnip! and tags the Varg image on the black metal page several months ago. I couldn't understand why; the rationale was there, albeit improper formatting. Then I did a little reseach and found a religious background to the kid. Fine, but that shouldn't impede on his Misplaced Pages edits.
Anyway, he backed down. Months later, a couple days ago, he returns with a new alias, User:Nobody of Consequence, and retires his former account. Without calling attention to this, however, he goes and starts a topic about me and the Varg picture issue... again, now! Months later! Yikes! Guess he's not over it... somehow... sadly.
Anyway, now he's just out to say the image is needless, as I have since instated the proper fair use rationale tags. Can you believe it? See if you want to weigh in on this issue, seeing as that you also guard the page from such lunacy. And if not, that's okay. In the end, even if it gets deleted, I already know what to do. Logical Defense (talk) 04:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)