| Revision as of 07:02, 10 July 2005 edit67.182.157.6 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:07, 10 July 2005 edit undoBanno (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,532 edits →Too feeble???Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Don't be silly. An unambiguous mention of the actual meaning of the term, 'true' -- in accord with the actual state of affairs in any particular case -- is needed to give it the ] to float above the sea of theist ] in ]. | Don't be silly. An unambiguous mention of the actual meaning of the term, 'true' -- in accord with the actual state of affairs in any particular case -- is needed to give it the ] to float above the sea of theist ] in ]. | ||
| :The definition offered is blatantly POV - see ]] 07:07, July 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:07, 10 July 2005
Why is True auto redirecting to Truth? Might want a disambigous page w/ also links to True in terms of other things, (I came looking for Computer Science related info) --ORBIT 18:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
Redirect
The definition given here is far too feeble. ... Banno 21:00, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
Too feeble???
Don't be silly. An unambiguous mention of the actual meaning of the term, 'true' -- in accord with the actual state of affairs in any particular case -- is needed to give it the buoyancy to float above the sea of theist obscurantism in Truth.