Pluto planetary status controversy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:02, 29 August 2006 editAndrew Norman (talk \| contribs)4,289 edits See Misplaced Pages:Content forking, and discuss on Talk:Pluto before splitting the article.← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:21, 18 January 2008 edit undoRightGot (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users712 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			]'s official status as a planet has been a constant subject of controversy since its discovery since the 1990s, when hundreds of smaller objects were found the area of Pluto.
	#REDIRECT ]

			===Omission from museum models===
			Museum and planetarium directors occasionally would create controversy by omitting Pluto from planetary models of the solar system. Some omissions were intentional; the ] reopened after renovation in ] with a model of 8 planets without Pluto. The controversy made headlines in the media at the time. <ref>http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/tyson_responds_010202.html</ref>

			===New discoveries ignite debate===
			], ], and ]]]
			Continuing advances in telescope technology allowed for further discoveries of ]s in the 21st century, some of comparable size to that of Pluto. In 2002, ] was discovered, with a 1,280 kilometers diameter, making it a bit more than half the size of Pluto. In 2004, the discoverers of ] placed an upper limit of 1,800 kilometers on its diameter, near Pluto's diameter of 2,320 kilometers.

			On ], ], a ] called {{mpl\|2003 UB\|313}} (nicknamed "Xena") was announced, which on the basis of its ] and simple ] considerations is assumed to be slightly larger than Pluto. This was the largest object discovered in the solar system since ] in 1846. Discoverers and media initially called it the "tenth planet", although there was no official consensus at the time on whether to call it a planet. Others in the astronomy community considered the discovery to be the strongest argument for reclassifying Pluto as a minor planet.

			The last remaining distinguishing feature of Pluto was now its large moon, ], and its atmosphere; these characteristics are probably not unique to Pluto: several other Trans-Neptunian objects have satellites; and {{mp\|2003 UB\|313}}'s spectrum suggests that it has a similar surface composition to Pluto, as well as a moon (nicknamed "Gabrielle"), discovered in September 2005. Trans-Neptunian object {{mpl\|2003 EL\|61}} (nicknamed "Santa") has two moons (one of which is nicknamed "Rudolph") and is the fourth largest TNO behind {{mpl\|2003 UB\|313}}, Pluto, and {{mpl\|2005 FY\|9}} (nicknamed "Easterbunny").

			=== IAU 2006 decision ===

			{{further\| ], ], ]}}

			There are three main conditions for an object to be called a 'planet', according to the IAU resolution in 2006.
			#The object must be in orbit around a star, but not be a star itself.
			#The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of ].
			#It must have ] around its orbit.

			Pluto fails to meet the third condition<ref>{{cite news\|url=http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0603/index.html\|title=IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes\|publisher=IAU\|date=24 August 2006\|publisher=IAU}}</ref>, but will act as a prototype for a yet to be named ] of ]s.

			=== Impact of the IAU decision ===
			The news of Pluto's reclassification by the IAU was met with a mixture of bemusement in the press <ref name="geoff2006b">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/24/science/space/25pluto.html?ei=5087&en=cfe4d03207c823f2&ex=1172030400&adxnnl=1&excamp=GGGNpluto&adxnnlx=1156820936-x7vi0zUxIJHoKC1TQ0qrMA
			</ref> alongside stories of an astronomer backlash against the decision.<ref name="geoff2006c">http://space.com/scienceastronomy/060824_planet_definition.html</ref>
			Multiple petitions exist online asking the IAU for reinstatement.

			Alan Stern (leader of the ] "]" mission to Pluto) has derided the IAU decision, stating "the definition stinks, for technical reasons."<ref name="geoff2006a">http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14489259/</ref> Stern's contention is that the new definition should also exclude Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids<ref name="newscientistspace">http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn9846-new-planet-definition-sparks-furore.html</ref>.

			===Commemoration as a planet===

			Pluto is shown as a major planet on the ], an inscription on the space probes '']'' and '']'', launched in the early 1970s. The plaque, intended to give information about the origin of the probes to any alien civilization that might in the future encounter the vehicles, includes a diagram of our solar system, showing nine planets. Similarly, an analog image contained within the ], included on the probes '']'' and '']'', also launched in the 1970s includes data regarding Pluto and again shows it as the ninth planet.

			Elements 92, 93, and 94 are named ], ], and ] respectively after the planets ], ], and Pluto.

			]

Revision as of 14:21, 18 January 2008

Pluto's official status as a planet has been a constant subject of controversy since its discovery since the 1990s, when hundreds of smaller objects were found the area of Pluto.

Omission from museum models

Museum and planetarium directors occasionally would create controversy by omitting Pluto from planetary models of the solar system. Some omissions were intentional; the Hayden Planetarium reopened after renovation in 2000 with a model of 8 planets without Pluto. The controversy made headlines in the media at the time.

New discoveries ignite debate

Continuing advances in telescope technology allowed for further discoveries of Trans-Neptunian objects in the 21st century, some of comparable size to that of Pluto. In 2002, 50000 Quaoar was discovered, with a 1,280 kilometers diameter, making it a bit more than half the size of Pluto. In 2004, the discoverers of 90377 Sedna placed an upper limit of 1,800 kilometers on its diameter, near Pluto's diameter of 2,320 kilometers.

On July 29, 2005, a Trans-Neptunian object called 2003 UB313 (nicknamed "Xena") was announced, which on the basis of its magnitude and simple albedo considerations is assumed to be slightly larger than Pluto. This was the largest object discovered in the solar system since Neptune in 1846. Discoverers and media initially called it the "tenth planet", although there was no official consensus at the time on whether to call it a planet. Others in the astronomy community considered the discovery to be the strongest argument for reclassifying Pluto as a minor planet.

The last remaining distinguishing feature of Pluto was now its large moon, Charon, and its atmosphere; these characteristics are probably not unique to Pluto: several other Trans-Neptunian objects have satellites; and 2003 UB₃₁₃'s spectrum suggests that it has a similar surface composition to Pluto, as well as a moon (nicknamed "Gabrielle"), discovered in September 2005. Trans-Neptunian object 2003 EL61 (nicknamed "Santa") has two moons (one of which is nicknamed "Rudolph") and is the fourth largest TNO behind 2003 UB313, Pluto, and 2005 FY9 (nicknamed "Easterbunny").

IAU 2006 decision

Further information: ]

There are three main conditions for an object to be called a 'planet', according to the IAU resolution in 2006.

The object must be in orbit around a star, but not be a star itself.
The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
It must have cleared the neighborhood around its orbit.

Pluto fails to meet the third condition, but will act as a prototype for a yet to be named category of Trans-Neptunian objects.

Impact of the IAU decision

The news of Pluto's reclassification by the IAU was met with a mixture of bemusement in the press alongside stories of an astronomer backlash against the decision. Multiple petitions exist online asking the IAU for reinstatement.

Alan Stern (leader of the NASA "New Horizons" mission to Pluto) has derided the IAU decision, stating "the definition stinks, for technical reasons." Stern's contention is that the new definition should also exclude Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids.

Commemoration as a planet

Pluto is shown as a major planet on the Pioneer plaque, an inscription on the space probes Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11, launched in the early 1970s. The plaque, intended to give information about the origin of the probes to any alien civilization that might in the future encounter the vehicles, includes a diagram of our solar system, showing nine planets. Similarly, an analog image contained within the Voyager Golden Record, included on the probes Voyager 1 and Voyager 2, also launched in the 1970s includes data regarding Pluto and again shows it as the ninth planet.

Elements 92, 93, and 94 are named uranium, neptunium, and plutonium respectively after the planets Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto.

Category:

Pluto