Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:35, 24 January 2008

Your message

"I was just reading curtis discussion, sorry man but gotta agree with the unknown guy, he had a point there when he said you aint all that trying 2 act like you know everything. Just remember where you started asa beginner its only a page, your not going ot win a nobel prize or anything for best article on wikipedia."

I take care of the article and make sure no one adds uncited material or vandalizes it. If I won't do it, someone else will. I never acted like I know everything, I just tried to make sure no one does anything until the discussion is resolved. If I made you think I am trying to control the article, then I am sorry, because I did not mean to. By the way, I don't think I'm "all that trying to act like I know everything". However, I do know more than a new editor, so I should at least try to teach them how to edit Misplaced Pages, what is acceptable, what is not. Once again, sorry if I was acting rude to you. Happy editing. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 19:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Curtis (50 Cent album)

Right, thank you for your comment on my talk page, I am really trying my best to make sure nothing uncited gets added to the "Curtis (50 Cent album)" article. Right now though, I think no one really knows that much about the album, the only thing I know is what I see on the Internet, so yeah. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 16:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 203.48.199.17 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Chaser - T 06:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jackson album

I have actually dealt with this before. The problem is that the source you gave is pretty much the only one that says that Jackson's upcoming album will be titled "7EVEN." No other media outlets have reported that information and I believe Jackson's representatives haven't said anything on it either. Same for Jackson himself. It's speculative at best and does not belong in Misplaced Pages at this moment. The most appropriate course of action would be to wait for official confirmation (ie. a statement from Jackson).UberCryxic 03:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Ne-Yo

In regards to your question, most of Ne-Yo's unreleased material is on http://www.imeem.com/ and LimeWire. I'll be uploading most of it onto imeem, and I'll send you my account so you can download it. It might not be downloadable, but I'll see what I can do for ya. Mickel

Leak

Curtis Leak WHERE Secondandonly 00:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Curtis clean leak

No, it is not notable and does not need to be included or announced. See Graduation, the full retail album has been leaked and nothing is included, no need. Also please sign your comments using the tenth button at the top of your edit box. --Ayoleftyz 04:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Kanye West vocals on "Roc Boys"

Yes, he has small background vocals but we don't know if he is credited for it or not since the album hasn't been released yet. So until then, I guess I can make a note of it in the single article but that's it. --Ayoleftyz 00:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Ayoleftyz 00:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Joe & Wayne

I wouldn't know, they've kept it kind of discreet. Haven't heard of any more beefin. - NJ Rock —Preceding comment was added at 03:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Usher

LoL, I got 'cha!--FSX-2007 08:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Lil wayne.

Yes, I have read the article. I think that it should be confirmed by multiple sources before deleting the article. One source is not enough for that. Mind you, Lil Wayne spoke about The Leak so it should be released, if not confirmed by multiple sources that it's been cancelled. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of El Duo Dinámico

An article that you have been involved in editing, El Duo Dinámico, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/El Duo Dinámico. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tha Carter III: The Leak

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tha Carter III: The Leak, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tha Carter III: The Leak. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

In My Ghetto

Stop it. This is an album and you can't deny it. Rappingwonders2 (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Trimy67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I normally edit wikipedia daily and i have contributed to a fair amount of articles in the past few days. I would love to continue to edit today? I find it a bit unfair that i have to suffer just because of someone elses stupid ways.

Decline reason:

reason — You were not directly blocked, you need to use the unblock-auto template, you're caught in an auto block of an IP, it appears. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Trimy67 (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

IP address: 203.48.199.17 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Block ID: #759990 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: Spellcast (talk • blocks)
Block message:

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Trimy67}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Spellcast | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hia998". The reason given for Hia998's block is: "troll account".</nowiki> | 3=203.48.199.17 | 4=759990 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=203.48.199.17 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hia998". The reason given for Hia998's block is: "troll account".</nowiki> | 3=Spellcast | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=203.48.199.17 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hia998". The reason given for Hia998's block is: "troll account".</nowiki> | 3=Spellcast | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock
• Requests for unblock-auto