| Revision as of 01:31, 26 January 2008 edit68.224.117.152 (talk) marbcom -->ArbCom← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:17, 26 January 2008 edit undoOmtay38 (talk | contribs)5,189 edits removing {{tnull|helpme}}Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{IPsock|Ionas68224|confirmed}} | {{IPsock|Ionas68224|confirmed}} | ||
| {{helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}} | {{tnull|helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}} | ||
| :The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the {{tnull|helpme}} tag. ArbCom will contact you. --<font color="#617599" face="Courier New">]</font><font color="#999999" face="Courier New">]</font> 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Can an arbitrator please respond to this: | Can an arbitrator please respond to this: | ||
Revision as of 02:17, 26 January 2008
Template:IPsock
{{helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}}
- The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the
{{helpme}}tag. ArbCom will contact you. --omtay38 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Can an arbitrator please respond to this: I have sent the following E-mail to the Arbitration Committee and they have not responded, see the date the mail was sent. The arbitrators either: do not read emails, refused to read mine, or have not got it yet. Now I will WP:AGF that they have not received my email, so I will post it here:
I am User:Ionas68224, and known on IRC as Ionas_Freeman. I have had a terrible history here, one that I won't go into great detail about. If you don't know, you can review http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 or http://simple.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 for the history. I would like to appeal my block, or what Ryulong and someone named "Ryanpostlethwait" on IRC (presumably User:Ryan_Postlethwaite) call a ban (even though I am not on LOBU and only they have called it a ban). I was previously a dick (after I was a vandal), and quite mean, not assuming good faith with vandals and basically unsympathetic as User:bibliotheque on English Misplaced Pages and kind of chatty on the Simple English Misplaced Pages. I then felt that I should change my en.wp name to match my simple.wp name, Ionas68224. And so I did. Then, I had made a comment saying on Ryulong (someone who I'd never met since then)'s RFC saying that he should be desysopped for his meanness, and people ganged up on me saying I had only been there 30 days, then saying that it was trolling, and even went so far to go that I was a terrible criminal for being on a B.A.D.S.I.T.E. wikipediareview, and for supporting Daniel Brandt. So, now I realise that Daniel is quite a mean person, using the law to intimidate people like Phaedriel after finding his old Misplaced Pages Review posts outing on WR that a certain editor was transsexual, revealing the real identity of Katefan0, and Phaedriel. Accuising one of our nicest Wikipedians of being a felon when I think he was actually doing something to "harass and annoy" Phaedriel, and I have concluded that since his threats never really turn into real lawsuits, he does it to feel proud of hisself. ---- So anyway, I want to contribute constructively under a new account. I will go under a conditional: If I am allowed back on, I will be blocked for up to a week, then, well, you know the rest (in the ARBCOM tradition) if I: a)harass users b)make mamy personal attacks after being warned c)am disruptive after being warned, or d)attack Ryulong (no warning needed) Is this something we can agree on? Ionas