Misplaced Pages

User talk:207.237.228.83: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:56, 27 January 2008 editTvoz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,635 edits I don't think so: if the behavior has stopped, let's not pursue this← Previous edit Revision as of 21:31, 27 January 2008 edit undo207.237.228.83 (talk) I don't think soNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


:: I said that it appears to me that the same person made all of the comments in question, under both IPs, as the timing, targets and similarities in tone and content, are far too great to be coincidence. I still believe that. If you've apologized to the person they were directed toward, and the apology was accepted, ''and you don't use that kind of approach any more'', then we're done. I believe that people can learn from their mistakes, but let's not pursue the issue of whether or not it all was the same person, ok? <strong>] </strong>|<small>]</small> 08:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC) :: I said that it appears to me that the same person made all of the comments in question, under both IPs, as the timing, targets and similarities in tone and content, are far too great to be coincidence. I still believe that. If you've apologized to the person they were directed toward, and the apology was accepted, ''and you don't use that kind of approach any more'', then we're done. I believe that people can learn from their mistakes, but let's not pursue the issue of whether or not it all was the same person, ok? <strong>] </strong>|<small>]</small> 08:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

:::I agree that we should move forward and leave any misgivings in the past, and I appreciate your cooperation.
:::It is my sincerest hope that with all this behind us we can now <u>move forward and address the MANY Non NPOV items that I have pointed out in the Nancy Reagan article.</u> <br>Is this now possible? ] (]) 21:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:31, 27 January 2008

No personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Happyme22. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This was this IP's second attack on that userpage that I'm aware of. Tvoz |talk 22:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think so

And this edit by your IP? If you have legitimate concerns, then provide evidence. Your sarcastic comments to another editor will not get you anywhere. Tvoz |talk 22:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Evidence has now been supplied. Happyme22 is still resisting the necessary changes to create further Neutrality to the article. Now what?207.237.228.83 (talk) 07:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Please see comments to your talk page as well as discussion on Nancy Reagan article for my evidence and concerns. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I said that it appears to me that the same person made all of the comments in question, under both IPs, as the timing, targets and similarities in tone and content, are far too great to be coincidence. I still believe that. If you've apologized to the person they were directed toward, and the apology was accepted, and you don't use that kind of approach any more, then we're done. I believe that people can learn from their mistakes, but let's not pursue the issue of whether or not it all was the same person, ok? Tvoz |talk 08:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree that we should move forward and leave any misgivings in the past, and I appreciate your cooperation.
It is my sincerest hope that with all this behind us we can now move forward and address the MANY Non NPOV items that I have pointed out in the Nancy Reagan article.
Is this now possible? 207.237.228.83 (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)