Revision as of 00:01, 28 January 2008 view sourceYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,821 edits Remove vacation message, though I'm not anywhere near as active as in 2007← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:08, 29 January 2008 view source Sarvagnya (talk | contribs)9,152 edits →Bollywoodblog: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
I can see that ] has not learnt his lesson. Can you actually block them for like forever and take there user off or sometihng as it is becomeing an issue. Please reply ] (]) 06:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) | I can see that ] has not learnt his lesson. Can you actually block them for like forever and take there user off or sometihng as it is becomeing an issue. Please reply ] (]) 06:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I show no contributions from that user for a month. Could you please let me know what actions you are talking about? Thanks. --] (]) 22:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC) | :I show no contributions from that user for a month. Could you please let me know what actions you are talking about? Thanks. --] (]) 22:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
Hey, can you please weigh in on that page? I think it is high time we got rid of those images. Atleast I dont see any new evidence that they're not cpvios. Have you seen any? Please let me know. Thanks. ] 17:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:08, 29 January 2008
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived to User talk:Yamla/Archive 15. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Archive
- Archive 1 (from Dec 16, 2004 to April 17, 2006)
- Archive 2 (from April 17, 2006 to May 31, 2006)
- Archive 3 (from June 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006)
- Archive 4 (from July 1, 2006 to August 14, 2006)
- Archive 5 (from August 14, 2006 to September 2, 2006)
- Archive 6
- Archive 7
- Archive 8
- Archive 9
- Archive 10
- Archive 11
- Archive 12
- Archive 13
- Archive 14
- Archive 15
Peaches Music & Video (Record Store)
I know it's been a while, but I feel that this article should not have been deleted. It was a well-known chain of record stores in the southeastern US--not just a single store.
- 16:52, 11 January 2007 Yamla (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Peaches Music & Video (Record Store)" (content was: 'Why are we considering deleting an article about a major chain of music stores.' (and the only contributor was 'Cylonhunter'))
--Mister Tog (talk) 05:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- This article failed CSD#A7. If you believe it can be recreated in such a way as to assert notability (multiple independent sources, etc.), please feel free to create an article in your userspace and then ask someone to move it over once they have verified your claims (in article) of notability and checked your sources are reliable. --Yamla (talk) 14:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jade Raymond
An editor has nominated Jade Raymond, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jade Raymond and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 14:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Fellowship of Friends
Hello Yamla
Excuse me, but pt:Fellowship of Friends has been eliminated in pt.wiki.
Thank you for help Adailton (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, removed. --Yamla (talk) 14:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Questions
Can admins view pages that have been deleted? I think I heard they can but I'm not sure. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, unless they have been oversighted. --Yamla (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Can you take a look at . It says for the deletion reason that I requested it, when I couldn't have requested it since I was in a car on my way to New Jersey when it was deleted. The page should've been 2 LOE that i had been working on at the time. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
It's back
See her contribs. Precious Roy (talk) 10:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked. --Yamla (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- This might be her edit also. WHOIS=Toronto. Ward3001 (talk) 02:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeap, we know she uses other addresses in that /16 range. Unfortunately, it's a huge range considering how frequently she vandalises. --Yamla (talk) 03:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Are we approaching critical mass yet? Precious Roy (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Waw!
I've never known of any user with that much contributions!!!--Damifb (talk) 16:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Image question
I checked this image when it was added. The licensing template as written says that *any* image on the .net domain is licensed. Only those images on one of the .com domains are restricted to 2001 or earlier. I have reverted the edit on commons, but I thought I would draw this to your attention. If the commons template is misphrased and does not represent the OTRS ticket, that's a different issue. Gimmetrow 17:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, sorry for my mistake. --Yamla (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Bingham McCutchen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Hi there, I saw you speedy deleted Bingham McCutchen yesterday because of the edits somebody from the company kept making, but I'd like to ask if you could take another look at this article and the history. I seem to remember (although not with certainty) that there was already a perfectly okay start-class article further back in the history, fairly neutral and that, long before the employee(s) came along last week and started meddling with it to get it how they wanted; perhaps it would be better to just revert to the old version. Otherwise, the way I see it, the edits that person kept making have led directly to the complete erasure of an article. If any new editor could come along and edit an article straight into the garbage bin Misplaced Pages would be in all sorts of trouble! I can't remember exactly what was there but could you take another look, and possibly undelete it at a stable point in the history? • Anakin 15:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are right, done. --Yamla (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, the article isn't as good as I'd thought it was. Thanks though! :) • Anakin 15:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Englandbridge
Perhaps I misinterpret, but it appears that User:Englandbridge is a sock of User:Tweety21, and IP sock of whose you just blocked. --Pleasantville (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, yes. This is a banned vandal who has caused substantial problems for the Misplaced Pages. --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Don't forget Englandrules! Ta, Precious Roy (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion Review for Alzano Virescit F.C.
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alzano Virescit F.C.. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CapPixel (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Tweety21
Hi Yamla, hope you enjoyed your snowboarding/skiing. The closest one I get is in Runcorn!
It must be damn annoying dealing with Tweety21 (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log), and I'm willing to make a Misplaced Pages:Abuse reports/Tweety21 page to deal with this vandal. Hope this helps. --Solumeiras (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
She's back on her sock 142.205.212.203 (talk · contribs) here. Ward3001 (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, blocked. --Yamla (talk) 04:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Possibly another one as Burke and Hare (talk · contribs) here. Ward3001 (talk) 13:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good lookin' out but I think that's some unrelated vandalism. Precious Roy (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, there's not enough there to establish a link. It's very possible but without checkuser access, nothing I can do. --Yamla (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I've been considering filing a WP:LTA report. Do you think it would be worthwhile? If so, do you think it should go on the main page or as its own page (if you have any experience with LTA—I don't)? Precious Roy (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I must admit, I thought there already was one. I'm not sure why I thought this as several people have suggested that creating such a page might be a good idea. In my opinion, I'd go with a report on its own page in this case but my experience with LTA pretty much only extends to Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/Daddy Kindsoul and Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/Verdict. In any case, much of the content of your sockwatch page could end up being copied into the LTA page. --Yamla (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- After re-reading the guidelines for creating a sub-page, I'm not sure that this qualifies so I put it on the main page. It can always be moved to a sub-page if someone else thinks it warrants one. Thanks again for all your help. Precious Roy (talk) 21:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
By the way, is the long-term soft-block on User talk:142.205.212.203 still working? If so, I hope that existing accounts under that, such as mine, are not affected. GoldDragon (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Why did
you revert my "vandalism" is this seriously what you do on vacation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.174.152 (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Pleaseee
Reverting to my edits for Miley Cyrus on the account Piazzajordan2. My sister found out my account password. And used this. Can i please have another chance. Please unblock me. I will assure you, this will never happen again. thank you. message back. -PiazzaJordan2Replacement —Preceding unsigned comment added by PiazzaJordan2Replacement (talk • contribs) 19:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is hardly the first time you've been caught vandalising. And then to set up a sockpuppet account with the expressed intention of avoiding blocks. Your block timer has been reset for one week. Any further vandalism may result in an indefinite block. --Yamla (talk) 22:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Admin bullying
Please explain how "Foz, not sure why you decided to stick your nose in here - but I'd rather an explanation why you ignored Waggers sneering attack on me than some whining rationale for blocking me." is construed as a personal attack meriting sealing my page. Thanks Sarah777 (talk) 23:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I have waited a reasonable amount of time for a reply. Do you not feel there is any obligation on an Admin to explain the reasons why they issue unusually punitive blocks? Even the "offended" Admin has distanced himself from your decision. Refer to my question above; how does that constitute "incivility" that would merit a talkpage block? Sarah777 (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I did not see this message until just now. Please see WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. I simply do not believe that characterising someone's comments as a "sneering attack" and someone else's actions as "whining rationale" is at all appropriate. I am sorry you feel otherwise. --Yamla (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Dyslexicbudgie being fully blocked
I can see that User:Dyslexicbudgie has not learnt his lesson. Can you actually block them for like forever and take there user off or sometihng as it is becomeing an issue. Please reply Pattav2 (talk) 06:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I show no contributions from that user for a month. Could you please let me know what actions you are talking about? Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Bollywoodblog
Hey, can you please weigh in on that page? I think it is high time we got rid of those images. Atleast I dont see any new evidence that they're not cpvios. Have you seen any? Please let me know. Thanks. Sarvagnya 17:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)