Misplaced Pages

User talk:Daniel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:40, 3 February 2008 editSeresin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,029 edits /Workshop page format: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 01:41, 3 February 2008 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,450 edits fixNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


Hey Daniel. You said that the new format was requested by the arbitrators. As can be seen ], there is much opposition to the format. Is there/What is the process whereby we can request a change? Thanks. '''] | ]''' 01:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Hey Daniel. You said that the new format was requested by the arbitrators. As can be seen ], there is much opposition to the format. Is there/What is the process whereby we can request a change? Thanks. '''] | ]''' 01:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:You'd be best to raise a discussion on ] to discuss it generally. However, the pages are available as a convenience by the arbitrators, and they control the content on all pages, so the only process is to ask them to change the template back. However, it's unlikely (although not impossible), should they agree to change it back, that the ''E&C2'' workshop page would be restructured. Cheers, ] (]) 01:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC) :You'd be best to raise a discussion on ] to discuss it generally. However, the pages are available as a convenience by the arbitrators for the parties of a case, and they can control the general use on the workshop page, so the only process is to ask them to change the template back. Cheers, ] (]) 01:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
::Okay thanks. I've started a thread asking them to take the concerns under advisement. '''] | ]''' 01:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC) ::Okay thanks. I've started a thread asking them to take the concerns under advisement. '''] | ]''' 01:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:::No worries. ] (]) 01:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:41, 3 February 2008

User:Daniel/Icons User:Daniel/Header User talk:Daniel/Header

Archives

This page was last archived on Saturday, February 2. The most recent comments can be found in Archive 58. For a complete list of archives, please see here. If you wish to leave me a new message, please click here. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 11:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #13

Number 13, February 2, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of January 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Cyclone Gene formed on January 26 over the open south Pacific Ocean. It drifted southward, and strengthened into Tropical Storm Gene on January 28 as it moved across the Fijian archipelago. There, it brought heavy rainfall, which caused the worst flooding in several years. Half of the country was left without power, and the cyclone killed seven people in Fiji. The storm turned southwestward, developing a cloud-filled eye and quickly strengthening by the end of the month.

Other tropical cyclone activity

  • One tropical cyclone formed in the Western North Pacific Ocean west of The Philippines, which was analyzed by Japan Meteorological Agency as a depression; it tracked southwestward and did not significantly affect any land areas.
  • In addition to Cyclone Gene, Tropical Storm Elisa and Cyclone Fuma occurred in the South Pacific ocean during the month, along with three tropical depressions.
  • The only tropical cyclone in Australian region during the month was Tropical Cyclone Helen, which struck Australia.
  • Four tropical cyclones, three of which named, existed in the Southwest Indian Ocean during the month. The most notable was Cyclone Fame, which caused twelve deaths after striking Madagascar.

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar
Cyclone barnstar

The January member of the month is Ajm81. A tropical cyclone editor since he first joined in October 2005, Ajm81 plays a vital role in the project. Unlike other editors, who mainly edit articles, Ajm81 maintains and updates the track maps across the project. We thank Ajm81 for his timely contributions, and may he have some well-deserved downtime after the last tropical cyclone report is released.

New and improved articles

Main Page content

Storm article statistics

Grade Oct Nov Dec Jan
FA 30 31 33 33
A 9 8 9 9
GA 106 109 112 114
B 78 82 86 99
Start 212 211 208 214
Stub 5 6 6 3
Total 440 447 454 472
ω 3.02 3.01 2.98 2.98
percentage
Less than B
49.3 48.5 47.1 46.0

Wikiwork and 1000 articles In January 2008, the WikiProject began using a system called Wikiwork, or ω. It weighs the overall quality of the project's articles, and a lower number means a greater total quality. The weighed ω, as used above, is a relative number that can be used to compare groups of this article. As of this publication, the relative ω of the project is 3.404, corresponding to between Start and B class. However, when limiting it solely to storm articles, the number drops to 2.98, which is slightly better than B class. During the month, a new statistics page was created.

Additionally, during the month, Mitchazenia pointed out that we received our 1,000th article with the creation of Cyclone Elita.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Worthington

You didn't respond, so I was bold and recreated it in good faith. The previous deletion thing was not viewable, so I couldn't see why it was deleted previously. Not trying to step on any toes. --AW (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

/Workshop page format

Hey Daniel. You said here that the new format was requested by the arbitrators. As can be seen here, there is much opposition to the format. Is there/What is the process whereby we can request a change? Thanks. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

You'd be best to raise a discussion on WT:RfAr to discuss it generally. However, the pages are available as a convenience by the arbitrators for the parties of a case, and they can control the general use on the workshop page, so the only process is to ask them to change the template back. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Okay thanks. I've started a thread asking them to take the concerns under advisement. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
No worries. Daniel (talk) 01:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)