Misplaced Pages

Talk:Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:34, 17 July 2005 editJimWae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,709 edits Another scenario← Previous edit Revision as of 07:34, 17 July 2005 edit undoJimWae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,709 edits Another scenarioNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
== Another scenario == == Another scenario ==


Another possible scenario - when Sirhan started shooting, one of the security guards drew his revolver & accidentally shot Kennedy. I believe Sirhan would still be guilty of murder if such were the case Another possible scenario - when Sirhan started shooting, one of the security guards drew his revolver & accidentally shot Kennedy. I believe Sirhan would still be guilty of murder if such were the case--] 07:34, 2005 July 17 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:34, 17 July 2005

Moved from article space by Vicki Rosenzweig 22:09, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC):

"This is written off the top of my head, some details may not be exact. Please add details as known. The assanation was completed by the Iranian Savak. The method was a camera that had four small gun barrels hidden within the lens. Sirhan was designated to asail Mr. Kennedy within the confines of the pantry area should Mr. Kennedy choose to exit through there. The confirmation for the hit was the presence of the photographer in the bright yellow sweater. Sirhan began to fire, was overcome as bullets sprayed about, and in doing so provided the diversion that allowed the photographer to close in and fire at point blank range with the gun/lens at the back of Mr. Kennedy's skull. The film will bear out the sequence of events, including the oddly close proximity the yellowed sweatered photographer maintained on Mr. Kennedy's flank. Additional details cannot be made available at this time, safe to say this was a failsafe operation that could have followed many paths to the same result. TT0007"

Photographer? I thought it was supposed to be Cesar.
I never have found out how an 8-shot pistol with someone's thumb behind its trigger delivered 11 slugs.
New book, out, BTW: ISBN 0060580534 It has Robert Vaughn's endorsement (whoopee) =p Kwantus 17:40, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)

Someone should add that another key support for a second gunman is that the angles of entry for the bullets don't match with Sirhan's direction at all.


There are some disturbing coins under the picture of Kennedy... perhaps they should be removed, but I 'stole' it from Robert F. Kennedy. Pascal 22:18, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC)

The coins pictured in the article are of the special dollar coin that the US Government produced in honor of RFK in the late 90's. I'll remove them, since they have nothing to do with the RFK assassination itself. Unlike the Kennedy Half, the RFK silver dollar wasn't produced in honor of RFK after his death, they were done as a fund raiser for a charity named after RFK AFAIK.
Hope this helps!
PS: The Government stopped minting special silver dollars in the 50's until 1982.
hoshie 14:24, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)

What is the deal with Muslim?

Why does the fact that Sirhan Sirhan was a Christian not a Muslim have any relevance to whether the PLO was involved? Why are you putting it back? Are you an anti-Muslim who believes that only Muslims can be PLO terrorists? In which case that is very POV and not appropriate for this page.Dabbler 18:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

The article plainly states that Sirhan could have been acting independently, not at the behest of any larger organization. You are looking for bias where none exists.

Another scenario

Another possible scenario - when Sirhan started shooting, one of the security guards drew his revolver & accidentally shot Kennedy. I believe Sirhan would still be guilty of murder if such were the case--JimWae 07:34, 2005 July 17 (UTC)