| Revision as of 22:55, 9 February 2008 editCWii (talk | contribs)19,938 edits →February 2008← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:06, 9 February 2008 edit undo156.34.213.177 (talk) reply to CompwhiziiNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| :Note that vandal tools can be used to revert edits that are Legitimate also. <font style="color:Blue;">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 22:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | :Note that vandal tools can be used to revert edits that are Legitimate also. <font style="color:Blue;">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 22:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::I don't believe they should... just a difference of opinion I guess. Back when I was still an "account" I was a VandalProof user as well as popups and Lupins tools etc. I was very diligent that I did not use any vandal tool to revert an edit that caused a link error or went against known consensus or anything else that wasn't clear vandalism. For those rv's a correction with a proper edit summary was more appropriate. I have zero tolerance for vandals and trolls. But I can AGF a spelling mistake and not use something like popups to rv... because I think that's ill use of the tools. It makes not difference to me now. After I rolled over 20000 edits I abandoned my user account for the purity of anonymous editing. Which means that now... ''I have no tool'' ''':D''' <small>don't tell Wiki alf that I said that... he'll never let me forget it </small> Have a nice day! ] (]) 23:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:06, 9 February 2008
Sorry about that dude
Dream Theater rocks : ) Wisdom89 (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Templates
Stop re-formating templates. Your version is no different than mine other than the fact that it is a different color. Also, your version is not the standard musical artist template either. The difference between your template version and mine is a personal preference. Undeath (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Templates are not black. Only 11 year "metal stereotypes" make them that colour. Look at other Rock templates to see which colours are standard use. Then do Misplaced Pages a favour and go around and change all the templates that aren't the right colour so that they all look the same. Even better.... change them into the newer navbox format that uses the 'field 1', 'field 2' etc structure. Leave the black backgrounds for the amateur fansites and schoolboy book reports. This is an encyclopedia. 156.34.213.177 (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Rolling Stones revert
Hey-
I'm new to all this diff'ing & History stuff, but it appears that you reverted my "Rhythm & Blues" edit back to "ryhthm and blues", for WP:ATT, on the Rolling Stones page?
If so, why not add a fact tag, to give me a chance to find a cite, rather than just removing my edit? That's kinda rude...
ACushen (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Vampires (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Misplaced Pages:Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you. --Ixfd64 (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about that; I thought you were inserting false information. Your edit has been reinstated. --Ixfd64 (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note that vandal tools can be used to revert edits that are Legitimate also. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 22:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't believe they should... just a difference of opinion I guess. Back when I was still an "account" I was a VandalProof user as well as popups and Lupins tools etc. I was very diligent that I did not use any vandal tool to revert an edit that caused a link error or went against known consensus or anything else that wasn't clear vandalism. For those rv's a correction with a proper edit summary was more appropriate. I have zero tolerance for vandals and trolls. But I can AGF a spelling mistake and not use something like popups to rv... because I think that's ill use of the tools. It makes not difference to me now. After I rolled over 20000 edits I abandoned my user account for the purity of anonymous editing. Which means that now... I have no tool :D don't tell Wiki alf that I said that... he'll never let me forget it Have a nice day! 156.34.213.177 (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)