| Revision as of 05:52, 10 February 2008 editMatt91486 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,386 edits →Disappearance of Madeleine McCann: Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:07, 10 February 2008 edit undoKaraku (talk | contribs)421 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''' per ]. Obviously notable. ''']''']''']''' 05:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''' per ]. Obviously notable. ''']''']''']''' 05:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Obvious Keep''' - yes, all abductions are sad and there are unfortunately many of them. But very very few get the media attention of this one. ] (]) 05:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | *'''Obvious Keep''' - yes, all abductions are sad and there are unfortunately many of them. But very very few get the media attention of this one. ] (]) 05:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'''- Look, I fail to see how she's notable. There hasn't been alot of media coverage in MONTHS. She's not notable. Explain to me what makes her different from any other kidnapped kid. -] (]) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:07, 10 February 2008
Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
AfDs for this article:- Disappearance of Madeleine McCann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Very tragic, but kids get kidnapped every day, she's just not notable. Karaku (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note, for those wishing to comment, this article was the subject of a prior AFD, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Madeleine McCann, the result of which was "Keep", and the discussion was closed as a snowball after about 1 day. Other than to note that, I am officially neutral. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've corrected the nom, AfD notes show up properly now. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The article has 185 references. Am I missing something here? Doctorfluffy (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, you didn't miss anything. Its here, so discuss. Remember, I am neutral (see above) but yes, you are techincally correct. There are 185 references. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, I'll discuss then. Karaku, can you elaborate on how you believe this fails WP:N? Doctorfluffy (talk) 05:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, you didn't miss anything. Its here, so discuss. Remember, I am neutral (see above) but yes, you are techincally correct. There are 185 references. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion. Nom doesn't seem to be properly researched. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I see no problem with verifiability, notability, or anything else within this article -- heck, it's made GA status. But even if it weren't, I'd still argue keep, as I see no lack of notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 05:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Obviously notable. Lara❤Love 05:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Obvious Keep - yes, all abductions are sad and there are unfortunately many of them. But very very few get the media attention of this one. matt91486 (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment- Look, I fail to see how she's notable. There hasn't been alot of media coverage in MONTHS. She's not notable. Explain to me what makes her different from any other kidnapped kid. -Karaku (talk) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)