| Revision as of 06:10, 10 February 2008 editDoctorfluffy (talk | contribs)8,695 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:13, 10 February 2008 edit undoAlansohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers504,501 edits KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| *'''Comment'''- Look, I fail to see how she's notable. There hasn't been alot of media coverage in MONTHS. She's not notable. Explain to me what makes her different from any other kidnapped kid. -] (]) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''- Look, I fail to see how she's notable. There hasn't been alot of media coverage in MONTHS. She's not notable. Explain to me what makes her different from any other kidnapped kid. -] (]) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *:Have you even read ]? ] (]) 06:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | *:Have you even read ]? ] (]) 06:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' "kids get kidnapped every day, she's just not notable"?!?! Have you read the news, or watched TV in the past few months? If not, have you read the article? Notability could not be more clearly established. ] (]) 06:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:13, 10 February 2008
Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
AfDs for this article:- Disappearance of Madeleine McCann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Very tragic, but kids get kidnapped every day, she's just not notable. Karaku (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note, for those wishing to comment, this article was the subject of a prior AFD, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Madeleine McCann, the result of which was "Keep", and the discussion was closed as a snowball after about 1 day. Other than to note that, I am officially neutral. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've corrected the nom, AfD notes show up properly now. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. The article has 185 references. Am I missing something here? Doctorfluffy (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, you didn't miss anything. Its here, so discuss. Remember, I am neutral (see above) but yes, you are techincally correct. There are 185 references. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed, I'll discuss then. Karaku, can you elaborate on how you believe this fails WP:N? Doctorfluffy (talk) 05:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, you didn't miss anything. Its here, so discuss. Remember, I am neutral (see above) but yes, you are techincally correct. There are 185 references. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per previous discussion. Nom doesn't seem to be properly researched. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I see no problem with verifiability, notability, or anything else within this article -- heck, it's made GA status. But even if it weren't, I'd still argue keep, as I see no lack of notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 05:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Obviously notable. Lara❤Love 05:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Obvious Keep - yes, all abductions are sad and there are unfortunately many of them. But very very few get the media attention of this one. matt91486 (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment- Look, I fail to see how she's notable. There hasn't been alot of media coverage in MONTHS. She's not notable. Explain to me what makes her different from any other kidnapped kid. -Karaku (talk) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Have you even read WP:N? Doctorfluffy (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep "kids get kidnapped every day, she's just not notable"?!?! Have you read the news, or watched TV in the past few months? If not, have you read the article? Notability could not be more clearly established. Alansohn (talk) 06:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)