| Revision as of 06:30, 10 February 2008 editWiki Raja (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,470 editsm →Interesting edit summary comments by Bakasuprman: reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:41, 10 February 2008 edit undoTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits + reply from my talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| ::Er... Kindly explain the phenomena of having two different dates . I'll be a little more descriptive. Look carefully above my edit and you will see '''Revision as of 20:11, 23 January 2008 (edit) (undo)''' in blue bold face. Next, look inside the green box below and you will see the date '''03:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)''' right after my username. Please explain that to me since I am getting a headache trying to figure out the marvels of magic here. ] (]) 06:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ::Er... Kindly explain the phenomena of having two different dates . I'll be a little more descriptive. Look carefully above my edit and you will see '''Revision as of 20:11, 23 January 2008 (edit) (undo)''' in blue bold face. Next, look inside the green box below and you will see the date '''03:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)''' right after my username. Please explain that to me since I am getting a headache trying to figure out the marvels of magic here. ] (]) 06:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::I'm going to guess that you live in the Mountain Time Zone. I see ''Revision as of 22:11, 23 January 2008'' because I live in the Eastern Time Zone. The timestamp you see at the end of comments is in ] (hence the ''(UTC)''). When daylight-saving time is not in effect, the Mountain Time Zone is seven hours behind UTC (UTC-7) and, likewise, the Eastern Time Zone is five hours behind UTC (UTC-5). -- ''']''' 06:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:41, 10 February 2008
 Archives |
WikiProject Malaysia announcement
Hi there. I just want to announce that this month's collaboration will be ΦЏ Orang Asli ЏΦ. You are encouraged to participate in improving the quality of this article by however means you wish. I would suggest that our target by the end of the month would be for this article to achieve a Good Article status. Happy editing! kawaputra 13:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
AN/I
A discussion thread involving you has been started in AN/I. - KNM 17:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
{{Tamil-stub}} and {{Dravidian-stub}}
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Misplaced Pages:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Interesting edit summary comments by Bakasuprman
Here are some interesting comments made by Bakasuprman in his previous edit summaries: . This individual has something against folks who do not belong to the same faith as this user which was also the case with the recent 3RR this person committed. Further, the admin who let him of the hook makes me feel that he also favors editors of the same interests. Wiki Raja (talk)
Oh yeah, BTW, the admin Nishkid64 who blocked me stated that I did not engage in dialog on the page I was reverting. However, I did here. But wait a minute, something odd has occurred. That edit does not show in the history section
- Nothing fishy is going on. I see the issues you see regarding Bakasuprman, but the edits you mentioned are old. The most recent comes from October 2007, and the least recent date back to July and August 2006. There's nothing I can, or should, do about that now. Your edits do show up in the history of Talk:Bharatanatyam; they are, in fact, among the top-most edits in the history. -- tariqabjotu 05:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- You are partially right that I have edits on that page. However, the following edits which show on the talk page do not show in the history. Please look at the dates in bold face below really close.
03:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC):
06:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC):
Wiki Raja (talk) 05:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Um... they do appear in the history. The edit dated 03:10, January 24 (UTC) appears here and the edit dated 06:18, January 24 (UTC) appears here. -- tariqabjotu 06:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Er... Kindly explain the phenomena of having two different dates here. I'll be a little more descriptive. Look carefully above my edit and you will see Revision as of 20:11, 23 January 2008 (edit) (undo) in blue bold face. Next, look inside the green box below and you will see the date 03:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC) right after my username. Please explain that to me since I am getting a headache trying to figure out the marvels of magic here. Wiki Raja (talk) 06:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to guess that you live in the Mountain Time Zone. I see Revision as of 22:11, 23 January 2008 because I live in the Eastern Time Zone. The timestamp you see at the end of comments is in UTC (hence the (UTC)). When daylight-saving time is not in effect, the Mountain Time Zone is seven hours behind UTC (UTC-7) and, likewise, the Eastern Time Zone is five hours behind UTC (UTC-5). -- tariqabjotu 06:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)