| Revision as of 17:50, 9 February 2008 editWorking terriers (talk | contribs)229 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 10 February 2008 edit undo69.113.91.0 (talk) →general slocum fire: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| It is my hope that objective and educational reasoning will prevail concerning the Old English Terrier vs. the English White Terrier. They are not the same breed and they never have been. ] (]) 17:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | It is my hope that objective and educational reasoning will prevail concerning the Old English Terrier vs. the English White Terrier. They are not the same breed and they never have been. ] (]) 17:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == general slocum fire == | |||
| am not sure if this is correct site, though I wish to be directed to list of slocum fire victims as I found out | |||
| recently that my relatives were on the ship. It would help immensely with my geneology chart I am presently working on. | |||
| I was at slocum fire site and her I am. sorry if this is off subject.---Gloriana | |||
Revision as of 16:44, 10 February 2008
|
This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:Coredesat. | |
|---|---|
|
Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil. My user talk archives |
WP:METEO Active members
Red Shift: 4 Dimensional Theory
Just so you know, your PROD tag was removed by the author. Best, shoy 15:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
|
My RfA | |
| Thank you very much for your support in my RfA which I really appreciate. It closed at 83/0/0. I was surprised by the unanimity and will do my best to live up to the new role. All the best, --ROGER DAVIES 16:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Mrs. Hudson
You deleted Mrs. Hudson on 4 February 2008 as CSD A7 (Bio). However, I'm not sure it should have been speedied, presuming that the article referred to the Sherlock Holmes character. First of all, A7 only applies to real people. Next, note the number of articles that link to the character. I'm not well-versed in Holmes fiction, so I'm not saying that you were necessarily wrong that the article should be deleted; however, I do think that AfD would be more appropriate here. Thank you! —Disavian (/contribs) 20:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 41
Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 41 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/02/04/episode-41-setting-the-record-straight/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Misplaced Pages Weekly — WODUP 23:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
ED on userpage
My ED arguments on my userpage User:SamuelRiv/Articles/Encyclopedia Dramatica have been deleted. I would like my userpage restored, as I believe it was deleted without anyone reading the actual contents - the page was designed to host meta-arguments, not a copy of the controversial article itself. By deleting meta-arguments, you are saying that WP is effectively stifling any possible debate on this subject. Again, please restore this page. SamuelRiv (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Tornado outbreak naming
When you get a chance can you give your opinion on February 2008 tornado outbreak. One of the admins moved it saying it should not be capitalized. ---CWY2190 17:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of TeXTree
Please explain why you considered the page TeXTree patent Nonsense and deleted it ignoring the hangon tag. It certainly wasn't giberish. The page clearly wasn't very useful *yet* but I wonder how a page can become useful if it is deleted 5 minutes after one starts editing it. M8ram (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Ѕandahl has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Old English Terrier
I am not exactly sure why the Old English Terrier article keeps getting redirected to the White English Terrier article. The White English Terrier is a terrier breed that was created in the late 1800's while the Old English Terrier was created in the 1700's. The Old English Terrier was crossed with the Old English Bulldog to create most of today's Bull Terrier breeds. The fact that most of the Bull Terrier breeds are far older than the White English Terrier should give enough pause so that one can understand and grasp that a dog create over a century later cannot be the foundation stock of much older breeds.
It is my hope that objective and educational reasoning will prevail concerning the Old English Terrier vs. the English White Terrier. They are not the same breed and they never have been. Working terriers (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
general slocum fire
am not sure if this is correct site, though I wish to be directed to list of slocum fire victims as I found out
recently that my relatives were on the ship. It would help immensely with my geneology chart I am presently working on. I was at slocum fire site and her I am. sorry if this is off subject.---Gloriana