| Revision as of 00:26, 11 February 2008 editScarpy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers16,126 edits →Schizophrenics Anonymous← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:26, 11 February 2008 edit undoOrlady (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators94,575 edits →Schizophrenics Anonymous: AGFNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| * '''Strong Delete''' until it can be written using reliable sources. Seems to be a magnet for trolls. -- ] (]) 00:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | * '''Strong Delete''' until it can be written using reliable sources. Seems to be a magnet for trolls. -- ] (]) 00:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| **Please ''try'' to assume good faith. --] (]) 01:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:26, 11 February 2008
Schizophrenics Anonymous
- Schizophrenics Anonymous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable program and/or group. Jmlk17 03:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Even though the article fails to convey notability, the group is legitimate. 4,330 Google hits. 18,700 Altavista hits. Doczilla (talk) 07:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Org seems to be notable. Article needs help, though. (I added to it...) --Orlady (talk) 01:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 09:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep or Merge/Redirect to Schizophrenia.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, per Doczilla. --Oldak Quill 01:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a stub for a group that does exist; it needs attention, not to be deleted. Heck, a stub with two references is two references ahead of most of the other stubs on Misplaced Pages. --Ig8887 (talk) 07:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete until it can be written using reliable sources. Seems to be a magnet for trolls. -- Craigtalbert (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please try to assume good faith. --Orlady (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)