Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:05, 11 February 2008

Welcome

Hello QuackGuru! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cool Cosmos 20:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Getting started Misplaced Pages tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Citizendium

I recommend you ask on the RS noticeboard why another wiki is not considered a RS.--Hughgr (talk) 03:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but I don't wish to get into a debate with you about it. They should be able to explain it to your satisfaction.--Hughgr (talk) 03:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikis are generally not considered reliable sources because anybody can edit them, or because they're self-published sources; each edit is simply the opinion of one person. However, it seems to me that referring to a particular version of an approved page on Citizendium, approved by an editor with a known reputation, could be considered a reliable source according to the following clause in WP:V, provided the editor meets the stated qualification: "Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." --Coppertwig (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Why?

I'm not sure why you want to change the title of the article? OrangeMarlin 23:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Read the current article. Quack Guru 23:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

It's difficult with Levine and Hyperbole's constant reverts. OrangeMarlin 23:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

The current title does not make much sense anyways. Quack Guru 23:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Just a friendly suggestion

Cool it and give it a rest for awhile and see what others do. --CrohnieGal 15:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

PS you have mail! :) please remove this part at least when you read it, thanks, --CrohnieGal 15:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chiropractic care: Research and Criticism

I have nominated Chiropractic care: Research and Criticism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chiropractic care: Research and Criticism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Levine2112 19:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)