Misplaced Pages

User talk:Doctor Nigel Lewis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:23, 23 March 2007 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Oversighters75,400 edits →Comprimised? Spambot?: +← Previous edit Revision as of 09:59, 12 February 2008 edit undoDoctor Nigel Lewis (talk | contribs)20 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


Blocked pending some clarification from you - please explain using {{t1|unblock}}. Also see ]. Cheers, ''']''' 09:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Blocked pending some clarification from you - please explain using {{t1|unblock}}. Also see ]. Cheers, ''']''' 09:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|Account not compromised anymore...}}

Revision as of 09:59, 12 February 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. —xyzzyn 00:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for disrupting Misplaced Pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Merope 20:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Your AfD nomination

Hello; is it possible that you misspelled your recent AfD nomination? The article to which it points does not appear to exist. ◄Zahakiel► 05:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Nope, the article appears to have been deleted as a hoax, though there's no log entry. Probably some sort of weird lag. Either way, it's gone now. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that's what I noticed, the deletion log is blank or I would have just added the "end of debate" tags to the entry. That's why I thought it was just a misspelling of a still-existing article. It's happened before in AfDs. Oh, well. ◄Zahakiel► 20:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Comprimised? Spambot?

It's one of the above - see:-

Blocked pending some clarification from you - please explain using {{unblock}}. Also see WP:ANI#Possibly compromised account. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 09:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Doctor Nigel Lewis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Account not compromised anymore...

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Account not compromised anymore... |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Account not compromised anymore... |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Account not compromised anymore... |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: