| Revision as of 18:06, 12 February 2008 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Relata refero - "→Please discuss!: 1"← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:09, 12 February 2008 edit undoRelata refero (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,630 edits →Please discuss!: 34Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
| * avoids ] about the support for the pre-1991 dispensation in South Africa. | * avoids ] about the support for the pre-1991 dispensation in South Africa. | ||
| * rewords a sentence for clarity and explains the background of the SA Conservative Party. | |||
| *] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| * reduces a lengthy clause, focuses on an individual's primary role (and the reason for his death, which is relevant in this context) and provides some extremely neutral information about another individual's affiliation. | |||
| * removes a particularly irrelevant and unexplained part of an image caption. | |||
Revision as of 18:09, 12 February 2008
Please discuss!
Can the editor who has recently made several wholesale reverts please explain here which particular points he objects to? I made a series of incremental changes, each with an informative edit summary. I shall list them here so as to save him any trouble. Relata refero (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- this diff avoids obfuscation about the support for the pre-1991 dispensation in South Africa.
- this edit rewords a sentence for clarity and explains the background of the SA Conservative Party.
- this diff reduces a lengthy clause, focuses on an individual's primary role (and the reason for his death, which is relevant in this context) and provides some extremely neutral information about another individual's affiliation.
- this diff removes a particularly irrelevant and unexplained part of an image caption.