| Revision as of 20:56, 17 October 2006 editRuhrfisch (talk | contribs)Administrators52,118 edits →[]: semi automated peer review← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:02, 16 February 2008 edit undoMelonBot (talk | contribs)56,411 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Barbara Hambly to Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Barbara Hambly/archive1: Standardising Peer review archive formatting |
| (No difference) | |
Latest revision as of 11:02, 16 February 2008
Barbara Hambly
Rather than allow more edit warring, AND as I'm still learning, I'm asking for feedback and help in the recent edits. I understand I may be in error on my efforts, but I think I've made factual and proper good faith edits. I seem to have a problem with this user (WLU) owning every page she edits. Which may well be fine, but in asking several people on the IRC channel as well as a few Admin’s I was referred to this format to best deal with a "page owner". I'm seeking input that will help me be a better editor and to better understand the proper protocols and policies. Thanx --Mystar 04:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Mystar has made incorrect edits, which I have corrected and provided justification for in the talk pages. I have pointed out where Mystar was incorrect and provided references and quotations to back up my edits. Mystar does not seem to read the actual links, which is why I have moved from just the link, to the actual quotations I am using to support my changes. I do not own the pages I edit, many people have edited pages I have altered as well. WLU 13:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
From the instructions (above): "Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment." Sandy 00:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 20:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)