Misplaced Pages

Talk:RIM-161 Standard Missile 3: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:19, 16 February 2008 editDual Freq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers37,098 editsm moved Talk:RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 to Talk:RIM-161 Standard missile 3: lower case is more appropriate← Previous edit Revision as of 17:22, 16 February 2008 edit undoWDGraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,201 edits RMNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{move|RIM-161 Standard Missile 3}}

{{WPMILHIST {{WPMILHIST
|class= Start |class= Start
Line 11: Line 13:
|Maritime-task-force= yes |Maritime-task-force= yes
}} }}

==Requested move==
] → ] — Clearcut ] capitalisation issue for proper noun, but one editor is unhappy with this. —<font color="#115566">'''GW_Simulations'''<sub>] | ]</sub></font> 17:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC) {{#if:|<br><small>Discussion area setup by {{{completer}}}. Unless otherwise noted below, {{{completer}}} has no position one way or the other on this discussion.</small>}}

===Survey===
:''Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with'' <code><nowiki>*'''Support'''</nowiki></code> ''or'' <code><nowiki>*'''Oppose'''</nowiki></code>'', then sign your comment with'' <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>''. Since ], please explain your reasons, taking into account ].''

*

===Discussion===
:''Any additional comments:''

Revision as of 17:22, 16 February 2008

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: not checked
  2. Coverage and accuracy: not checked
  3. Structure: not checked
  4. Grammar and style: not checked
  5. Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
  • | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no>
  • | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no>
  • | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no>
  • | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no>
  • | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no>
assessing the article against each criterion.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Requested move

RIM-161 Standard missile 3 → RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 — Clearcut WP:NC capitalisation issue for proper noun, but one editor is unhappy with this. —GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 17:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Misplaced Pages's naming conventions.

Discussion

Any additional comments:
Categories: